From Deseret News archives:

New fight over vouchers

Published: Friday, March 9, 2007 12:21 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
"I don't know what we'd do ... it couldn't be implemented," Lear said.

She said the lack of the $9.2 million in mitigation money — funding that was clearly anticipated — is huge. Plus there would not be enough administrative money since HB174 only added an extra $100,000 to existing funding in the law.

"This is an amendment — there are significant limitations and we don't have enough information to run a program," Lear said.

Jenson said out of the 11 sections included in HB148, only five are in HB174 — leaving out the definitions, purposes, enforcement and accountability measures.

"It would be very hard to argue that the law stands when the amendment leaves out half of the language in HB148," Jenson said. "If you repeal the underlying bill the amendments are dead."

The voucher program provides Utah families with a private school tuition voucher ranging from $500 to $3,000 per student attending a private school. That doesn't sit well with voucher opponents, who don't want state funding going to private schools.

Story continues below
But some lawmakers said opponents who want to put the issue before voters would be shooting themselves in the foot if voters reject the voucher law, since the $9.2 million for the program is not appropriated in HB174, and districts could potentially not be held harmless for five years like the original bill promised.

That provision was meant to soften the blow to public schools losing students to private schools — something that helped woo moderates in the House who had opposed vouchers in past years.

"The only big difference that I am aware of is the hold harmless," Bramble said. "The money would be there, but there would not be a statutory obligation" to spend it on the voucher program.

As for Utahn's for Public Schools failing to challenge HB174, Lear said the group was in a "catch 22."

The law only allows a people to file a referendum five days after the session. HB174 wasn't signed until after that five-day window.

"They can't file referendum on a bill that is not even signed — you cant challenge something that you don't know if it is even going to be law," Lear said.


E-mail: terickson@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

no one can do any thing vs ben lomond we are 2-0 If we play like this the...

Colombian Mormon denied asylum

Dear Sick and Tired, You are an idiot. If you actually took the time to...

i like the baby blue jerseys! way better than the dark blue jerseys!

Homeless keep their focus on family

i have no family who can help so regardless if i have a place to stay or not...

"Mormons don't even celebrate advent. What is up with this?" There's...

He just does not have good basketball instincts. I know this is his first...

Ed Smart infuriated with revelations

To the 5:04 comentator, This is a FEDERAL prosecution. It is the entire...

Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing

Skousen and Beck? What an utter embarassment! THe fact that we have a panel...

I'm a little surprised by this choice of all-staters. I thought for sure San...

I find it strange when folks suggest that Atheism is a religion of its own....

Advertisements