From Deseret News archives:

Ethics reforms may be subtle, not sweeping

Published: Thursday, Feb. 22, 2007 12:11 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Instead of sweeping reforms, subtle changes may be the end result of legislative rules governing gifts and meals from lobbyists.

Already, the House has approved HB178 that would require the reporting, by name, of legislators who accept gifts valued at $5 or more, although meals under $50 would still be exempt. Wednesday, a Senate committee approved a similar bill, SB246, although the gift reporting would only apply to "tangible personal property" and not things such as golf games, meals or event tickets under $50.

Both bills would require quarterly reports from lobbyists, although they would not be required to file a year-end tally of their gifts.

Sen. Sheldon Killpack, R-Syracuse, the sponsor of SB246, said that his changes are based on what he thinks his fellow Senators will approve. While it was not going as far as some other bills, it was still tightening restrictions.

"I know there are individuals who want more and there are individuals who want less," Killpack said. "But I think this is a good step forward."

Along with the reporting for most tangible gifts, SB246 would also prohibit lobbyists from having clients on opposing sides of an issue, creating a conflict of interest. For example, a lobbyist could not represent banks and credit unions.

Story continues below
Travel would also have to be reported if it is paid for by a lobbyist.

Although the bill passed the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee unanimously, members still had concerns about the value of some of the changes. They also pointed out some new loopholes, such as the fact that a lobbyist who bought a legislator a $6 glass of wine would have to name the lawmaker because that is not a meal, but would not have to name the legislator who accepted a $45 meal.

Sen. Michael Waddoups, R-Taylorsville, also questioned the point of quarterly reports. By requiring four reports, the money given to legislators may actually seem "diminumus" to the public.

"It could be minimized if it's reported quarterly," he said. "I wonder which way is the better way."


E-mail: jloftin@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Congratulations!!! Awesome game. Thanks for some of the best soccer matches...

Timpview doesnt need to play 5A schools. No one would complain if they went...

No offense to Eric Dodge but who the heck is he?

Jazz need to win during homestand

now that`s crazy,boozers not even quick enough to stay with most 4`s,and you...

Cougars turn focus to dreaded rivals

Re: Who's next. Thats too funny, i think you meant to say "thanks for the...

Maybe Gov Sanford will quit. I mean, he has 37 ethics complaints against...

Hall, Johnson matchup key

just for your information the recent BCS rankings just came out and Utah...

It is already there pal. There is so much traffic on Redwood Road it is very...

Where's my pro-Palin comment??????????? I posted it here (or rather, tried...

Angel placed atop temple

To the 1:28 comment, How you get 700,000 plus people having been...

Advertisements