From Deseret News archives:

Bill to allow N. Salt Lake to annex 80 acres held in the Senate

Published: Thursday, Feb. 1, 2007 12:17 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The city of North Salt Lake may not get an easy ending to its fight over foothill open space with Salt Lake City.

A bill that would have allowed North Salt Lake to annex 80 acres of foothill land that it owns within Salt Lake City's boundaries was held in the Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee on Wednesday.

It may not have enough votes to make it out of the committee.

Sen. Dan Eastman, R-Bountiful, who is sponsoring SB130, said Wednesday that the intent of his bill was to assist North Salt Lake in its fight with Salt Lake City. Last year, the two cities sued each other over the 80 acres.

Salt Lake City wants the land to be kept as open space. Its lawsuit seeks to condemn a portion of the land so it couldn't be developed. North Salt Lake wants to develop a portion of the land. Its lawsuit seeks to disconnect the land from Salt Lake City's boundaries.

A trial date for the North Salt Lake lawsuit has been set for mid-February.

"This is obviously a single-issue piece of legislation," Eastman said during debate about the bill. "The cooperation from Salt Lake City to North Salt Lake has been just ridiculous. I agreed to run this legislation because I know the history."

Story continues below
If the bill were to pass, and if North Salt Lake were to win its lawsuit, the city would not have to petition Salt Lake County to annex the land. The land is also within Salt Lake County's boundaries, so North Salt Lake is required to petition both Salt Lake City and the county to annex it.

Salt Lake County passed a resolution last year saying that it would deny North Salt Lake's request to annex the land if the city were to win its lawsuit against Salt Lake.

Representatives from both Salt Lake County and Salt Lake City on Wednesday spoke against the measure.

Sen. Scott McCoy, D-Salt Lake City, said during debate that he believed the bill was meant as a way to influence Salt Lake City to reach a settlement with North Salt Lake.

"Why are we coming in and throwing a piece of legislation into the mix, which really quite frankly is meant to be a hammer to hang over their heads?" he asked. "It seems to me, this doesn't sound like a very sound process or is setting a good precedent for the orderly resolution of issues like this."


E-mail: nwarburton@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

It is hurting his wife financially for starters,, smokers have much higher...

TCU stuck at fourth in BCS

I agree with AZ BYU fan. TCU is the real deal, just like Utah was last year....

worth a comment

Jazz notes: Young bigs ride bench

Sloan defenders..badely. The big guys could help us in a lot of situations we...

Two teams in the MWC have won the National Championship. Two teams have...

Editorial: Red flags at Fort Hood

I'm LDS, and I'm so ashamed and embarassed by some the comments being posted...

to: at first 3 posters | 8:22 a.m. Nov. 16, 2009 just because barak...

Unfortunately at our latitude in SLC it is IMPOSSIBLE to get enough Vit D...

For those who call Obama a communist, please wake up and stop regurgitating...

Obama seeking a balance in China

so much bitterness so few fact to back it up.

Advertisements
Advertisement