From Deseret News archives:

More open ratings system?

Published: Sunday, Jan. 21, 2007 12:26 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
PARK CITY — Hollywood's movie-ratings system, which critics call a secretive process that leaves filmmakers in the dark, will implement changes to make it more open and understandable to parents and filmmakers, its overseers said.

Dan Glickman, who heads the Motion Picture Association of America that manages the ratings system, plans to meet with filmmakers Monday at the Sundance Film Festival to discuss the plans.

The most substantive change for directors would be in the appeals process, allowing filmmakers to cite similar objectionable scenes in past movies when trying to overturn what they think is an overly harsh rating that restricts the ages of movie-goers.

The ratings system and its appeals process were harshly criticized in director Kirby Dick's documentary "This Film Is Not Yet Rated," which premiered at Sundance last year.

Dick's film said the ratings system was stacked in favor of big studios represented by the MPAA and against independent filmmakers such as those who attend Sundance. His documentary also accused movie raters of conducting an anonymous process in which filmmakers and the public do not know who rates the movies or what standards are used to judge the films.

Story continues below
Arriving in Utah on Saturday, Glickman said the changes to the system were not prompted by Dick's documentary. Glickman said the revisions had been in the works since 2004, when he took over the MPAA from Jack Valenti, who founded the ratings-system in the late 1960s.

"The system works very well. What's clear to us is we need to do a better job of explaining the system, of making sure people know it's transparent, it's not secret, it's open and it's accessible," Glickman said.

At Monday's meeting at Sundance, Glickman will be accompanied by Joan Graves, who heads the MPAA's Classification and Ratings Administration that uses panels of raters to decide if movies should get an NC-17, R, PG-13, PG or G rating.

Among other changes the MPAA plans:

  • Posting the names of its three senior raters on the association's Web site. Other raters will remain anonymous, but details on their background, families and where they come from will be posted online.

  • Enforcing a policy to ensure that raters have school-age children, which the association's overseers said was important so raters could give parents proper perspective on what might be inappropriate for kids.

  • Putting information online about the association's standards for rating movies, along with forms and instructions to filmmakers for submitting movies for rating.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

RE: Maxie | 8:58 a.m. Nov. 29, 2009 How did Max Hall get the last laugh?...

Field goals, penalties doomed Utes

BYU 1 Utah 0 (Zero, zip, nil) You're right there is now no asterisk...

So start building small scale nuclear which can be situated near population...

Aggies blow away T-birds

USU beat SUU in Cedar City last year 72-65. Check your facts.

God Bless your Dad. Hopefully, he will recover. God Bless your family in...

We have a Department of Defence not a Department of Offence. As a Mormon I...

Racheal,since you bring up religious freedom.. what if someone's religious...

As I sit home crossing my fingers hopeing the current administration fails, I...

Unselfish givers are an inspiration

Ah yes, giver's. YOU BETTER BELIEVE the baby-boomer's, and, Elderly and Older...

I don't agree with Max's comments but I do understand his feelings....

Advertisements