From Deseret News archives:
Beholden to special interests?
Utah campaign funding 'unhealthy'
As special-interest cash increases, political experts say it raises concerns about whether lawmakers are more beholden to the voters who elect them or the special interests that pay for campaigns.
Utah's campaign finance system "is not healthy," says Kirk Jowers, head of the Hinckley Institute of Politics at the University of Utah. "Two previous national studies" on campaign finance "gave Utah an 'F' and a 'D-," said Jowers. "Everyday Utahns are disenfranchised through the special-interest giving" to legislators.
Tony Musci of Utah Common Cause, a government watchdog group, says Utah has some of the "loosest campaign finance laws" in the nation. "We have an open-door policy to giving" in local campaigns and as the cost of campaigns rise, "there is even more tension" as candidates seek bigger and bigger donations from special-interest groups.
Deseret Morning News graphic
Special-interest donations
Requires Adobe Acrobat.
|
But reform efforts have made no headway at the Legislature in recent years.
Big cash
Legislators who won their races raised $3.74 million in their latest elections, up from $2.7 million two years ago. Of that, $3.58 million came from special interests or the candidates' own pockets.
That means 95.7 percent of their money came from special interests or their own pockets this year, compared to 81.5 percent two years ago.
For its study, the Morning News defined special interests as corporations and their officers, lobbyists, trade and union groups, political action committees and people living outside a member's district. Political party groups were included as special interests because they in turn receive most of their money from special-interest groups.
















