From Deseret News archives:

Provo sues paving firm

City wants company to pay for sewage backup

Published: Wednesday, Nov. 1, 2006 10:58 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
PROVO — The carcass of a dog wouldn't have clogged a sewer last year if Staker & Parson Cos. hadn't paved over a manhole in northeast Provo, according to a lawsuit filed last week by the city of Provo.

The dog clog created a sewer backup that damaged 21 homes last year at a cost of $388,101.16, according to documents released by the city through a government records request. The city wants Ogden-based Staker & Parson to help foot the bill.

On Aug. 26, 2005, sewage backed into two homes near Timpview High School. City crews couldn't find the manhole at the intersection of 3750 North and Timpview Drive, so they moved north to the next manhole on 3750 North at Foothill Drive.

The crew shot water pressure down the line to dislodge the clog, but a couple of hours later, residents reported another sewer backup near 3400 North and 500 East. A city employee went down the manhole and found the dog's carcass blocking the line.

Provo Mayor Lewis Billings directed city staff to pay for the cleanup of the 18 homes damaged in the second backup. The city also made payments to residents for damages to their personal property.

Story continues below
Provo had hired Staker & Parson in 2004 to repave 3750 North and other streets in the area. The contract called for Staker & Parson to remove manholes in the streets, then cut down the road asphalt before putting down new pavement. After the paving was done, deputy city attorney David Dixon said Staker & Parson then was required to raise the manholes back to street level.

The lawsuit alleges Staker & Parson was negligent when its employees failed to raise and re-open the manhole at the intersection of 3750 North and Timpview Drive. Dixon said city crews regularly try to catch whatever is clogging a line by flushing water in at one manhole and catching the debris at the next manhole.

"We couldn't do it in this case because there wasn't a manhole," he said. "Staker & Parson surfaced over the top and nobody noticed because we didn't need to go down there until the sewer backup happened. We don't chart every manhole. That's what they get paid to do."

The suit asks that Staker & Parson be held liable for "a reasonable portion" of the costs based on the company's alleged negligence.

Company official Paul Glauser said Staker & Parson does not believe it is liable, but the company hasn't yet been served with the suit, which was filed last Thursday in 4th District Court in Provo.

"We're exploring the situation to find out the details and where our liability lies," Glauser said.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Aggie 'D' holds BYU to season low

USU, along with almost any other basketball team, has a home court advantage....

What bothers me is how quick this article assumes Romney suffered at the...

March trial set in bogus-bids case

a good criminal attorney so Yengitch is hired. The jury may well not be...

Woods crash did $3,200 damage

That's like me causing 1/100th of a cent worth of damage to something and...

Football is JUST A GAME!! People have the right to say and believe what they...

Notice how Hatch always talks about failure.... How about some success in...

Proud to be a Wildcat...proud of Randy Rahe, his staff and his team. Never...

But according to Dave Rose in an article earlier today, "we know who are...

Nearly 1,000 cats have found homes

keep them under controland have them "fixed" so they will not be picked up...

Can I get a WOOT YEAH?!

Advertisements