From Deseret News archives:

Utah candidates speak out on Iraq

Published: Thursday, Oct. 19, 2006 9:32 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
October is turning into one of the deadliest months in Iraq for U.S. troops this year — and the omnipresent question being debated in Washington is, "What do we do now?"

For Utah's 2006 congressional candidates, the answer to that question may depend on how they respond to the matter of whether the United States should have invaded Iraq in the first place.

A recent Deseret Morning News questionnaire asked candidates to tackle both issues.

Democratic Senate candidate Pete Ashdown didn't see an imminent threat in 2003 to justify invading Iraq. He added that the alternatives toward achieving a stable democracy in Iraq that were available in 2003 no longer exist. Ashdown said the United States should ask Iraq for a referendum on whether U.S. troops should stay or go.

"The best experts on Iraq are the Iraqi people," he said. "If they want us to leave, we should respect that."

Incumbent Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said he favored the invasion, pointing to a regime "in violation of international law" that had "ties to international terrorism." Hatch said further justification could be found with a government that refused to identify the whereabouts of its "claimed large quantities of weapons of mass destruction."

Story continues below
Hatch said he supports President Bush's efforts to complete efforts to develop a "secure constitutional government."

House Republican Rob Bishop, who represents the 1st District, said he wasn't in Congress when it authorized military action in Iraq, but he added that there was a "compelling legal case for action." Bishop said the focus now should be on whether the military has what it needs to complete its mission.

Bishop said the military has made "incredible" progress in Iraq and that he will rely on the military to come up with an exit strategy.

Earlier this month, the Army chief of staff, Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker, said the Army plans to keep its current level of soldiers in Iraq until 2010. Army soldiers total 120,000 of the 141,000 U.S. troops currently in Iraq.

Bishop's challenger, Steve Olsen, said he had supported "getting tough with Saddam" while recognizing the "tremendous" risks of war. Olsen added that war in Iraq has led to instability in the region.

Olsen wants the United States to continue helping Iraq with logistics, air cover, intelligence and training. But he also called for Iraqis to take over patrolling their streets and defending their country.

District 2 Republican candidate LaVar Christensen said he supported the U.S. actions in Iraq.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Wow. Killing for pills now. I am afraid to ask what's next. Are people that...

People are spending money for this. No wonder we are in a depression.

Palin book goes platinum

Please run for the GOP! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE!!! SARAH PALIN FOR PRESIDENT...

Utes won't respond to Hall

One thing we BYU fans have over you Utah fans -- we are members of the only...

Rabbis join NJ gay marriage debate

The Methodist Church (and a few other organizations) were told that if they...

BYU says Hall incident resolved

I was thinking of attending the Las Vegas Bowl this year. Now I think I'll...

Who's sean smith? Are you referring to Alex Smith, or Steve Smith perhaps....

I glanced at the headline and thought it said "Rabbits". That'd be news.

the reason you do not want to give your examples is because they have all...

Group leery of lake bridge plan

The bridge will be beautiful!

Advertisements