North Korea's apparent underground explosion of a nuclear device has sent ripples of concern around the world and the United Nations Security Council into crisis session.
Now for some cool stock-taking.
ARE WE ON THE BRINK OF WAR? Absolutely not. The United States has emphatically denied any intent of military action against the communist Pyongyang regime. Even if it wanted to act, there are no successful military options.
SO WHAT WILL THE SECURITY COUNCIL'S WEEKEND SANCTIONS ACHIEVE? The sanctions would freeze some North Korean assets, ban some travel and seek to ban imports or exports of material used for nuclear weapons. They will make life more difficult for Kim Jong Il, but probably not by themselves halt his nuclear weapons development program. Though the Security Council decision was unanimous, much depends on whether Russia, and particularly China, give anything but lip service to the sanctions.
IF HE IS SOMEHOW ABLE TO CONTINUE HIS NUCLEAR PROGRAM, HOW DANGEROUS IS HE? Kim is eccentric, wily and hard to read, but he is not suicidal. He may be able to put a nuclear device on one of his rockets, but he knows that if he shoots it at the United States or its allies the certain retaliation would obliterate much of his nation.
WELL, THEN, WHY SHOULD THE UNITED STATES BE CONCERNED? For two reasons. Firstly, he could sell to a terrorist group a suitcase nuclear bomb that could be used against a major American city. In the past he has provided weaponry to such groups for mercenary, not ideological reasons. Secondly, an unpredictable North Korea could trigger a rush by neighbors like Japan, South Korea and perhaps Taiwan to build nuclear arsenals.
WHAT DOES KIM REALLY WANT? Probably to make his isolated country with its wretched economy respected or at least feared. One persistent demand is for face-to-face negotiations with the American president.
SO WHY WON'T BUSH MEET WITH HIM? There are plenty of channels for North Korea and the United States to negotiate, besides a summit meeting. Moreover, Bush in his second presidential term has edged away from unilateralism in favor of multilateralism. He is particularly anxious for China, which has considerable sway with North Korea, to take a lead position in the six-nation negotiations that have been going on with North Korea.
- It's déjà vu all over again with...
- John Florez: Let's make education's Common...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The pros and...
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
- Letter: Utah newspapers need to cover both...
- Letter: UTA's free fare should not be abolished
- Letter: Obama shows allegiance to the...
56 - Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - Letter: Obama throws a curveball
31 - Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich...
26 - Letter: Age really matters regarding...
21 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
19 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
16 - It's déjà vu all over again...
13






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments