I was wondering, did the Mountain West Conference do any research before they made The mtn. channel deal?
Why would anyone in their right mind make a deal with CSTV/The mtn. (mostly owned by Comcast) and know that probably less than 2 percent of the MWC fan base cannot get, have or afford Comcast? Sure, CSTV/The mtn. (once again owned mostly by Comcast) said they offered DirecTV and Dish Network to carry the channel. Yeah, right! Why would Comcast offer a channel to their competitors? If DirecTV and Dish Network had CSTV/The mtn., then Comcast wouldn't get more subscribers. This deal only benefits Comcast, nobody else.
Christy Halla
Provo
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- It's déjà vu all over again with...
- John Florez: Let's make education's Common...
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The pros and...
- Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
- Letter: Utah newspapers need to cover both...
- Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich won't...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion
- Letter: Obama shows allegiance to the...
56 - Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - Letter: Obama throws a curveball
31 - Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich...
26 - Letter: Age really matters regarding...
21 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
19 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
16 - Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
12






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments