From Deseret News archives:

A ridiculous power struggle

Published: Monday, Sept. 11, 2006 8:11 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
State lawmakers have won the first round in the battle over who has the right to set rules regarding guns on a state university campus. But the bigger question ought to be why they are pressing this costly issue at all, forcing taxpayers to bear the cost of appeals through federal courts.

Has there been a rash of crimes on the University of Utah campus that demands students arm themselves? Are there even very many students on campus who genuinely care about this issue, or is this something trumped up by a few lawmakers with an ideological ax to grind? Shouldn't universities be places of free inquiry and learning, safe from intimidation?

All of these questions boil down to one disturbing answer. This issue, as state Attorney General Mark Shurtleff accurately put it, is not about guns at all. It is about control.

OK, so the state Supreme Court has settled that issue. In a 4-1 decision last week, the justices ruled that the U.'s long-standing policy against allowing firearms on campus violates state law, and that state law trumps a university policy. So now that that's clear, can we all get back to the issue of what would be a reasonable and intelligent state law regarding guns on campuses?

Story continues below
Under current law, it appears officials would be unable to bar a concealed weapons permit holder from bringing a gun into a football game at Rice-Eccles Stadium, or into the Huntsman Center for a basketball game. This would render security checks outside these arenas pointless.

Statistics have shown that even concealed-weapons permit holders sometimes commit crimes. Does this sound like a reasonable situation in a post 9/11 world?

Unfortunately, there is little reason to believe lawmakers will decide any time soon to change state law on this issue. And so the university's lawsuit, which originally was filed in federal court but was sent to state court by U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball, is likely to proceed. What is worse, a showdown may be looming as university officials insist they will continue the gun ban until the case is finally settled.

We understand the constitutional issues. We support the right to possess firearms, whether for personal safety or for sport. But reasonable exceptions must be made for public safety. Arguments that guns lead to greater safety have not held up under scholarly scrutiny. Surely, a law that allows guns on university campuses ought to be changed.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

BYU football: Unga resting to heal

As long as BYU doesn't try to go deep, they are going to be fine on offense....

Utes' Wynn in for awakening

This game is actually very close on paper. BYU has more yards per game, but...

Way to go Donny you had my vote from the start. I thought they gave to much...

Is there someplace where we can watch the Cougarettes perform? Is there...

How is Pleasant Grove ranked higher than Syracuse when Syracuse beat them in...

RSL defied doubters to win title

Just wanted to put my 2-cents worth in to all of this. So if anyone...

Jazz need to win during homestand

you will wait the rest of your life.. He could care less

I've been reading the book with by daughters. It's a short book and it...

The ethics commission simply researches complaints. They have no power to...

Well, maybe the Ute program has maturity but the fans...? See post above.

Advertisements