From Deseret News archives:

A bad anti-leak bill

Published: Sunday, Aug. 13, 2006 11:01 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The federal government is home to an ever-growing mountain of classified information. A good deal of it is trivial, dated or mundane. Some of it is of vital national importance.

The government already has the power to prosecute officials who knowingly leak information that harms national security, just as it can punish people in trusted positions who leak secret codes or military information or, as was alleged in the Valerie Plame case, the names of people acting undercover.

So there is little justification for a bill Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., has filed. It would punish any current or former government worker, or even civilian contractor, who leaks anything that is classified. The penalty would be either a fine or up to three years in prison, or both.

Story continues below
We have no quarrel with giving strong prison sentences to people who legitimately harm national security, but this bill doesn't address national security. Prosecutors could go after anyone who leaks anything from the growing mound of classified information without having to prove that the nation was harmed. It would put most government information, and its dissemination, in the hands of the executive branch. This nation's tradition always has been one of favoring free-flowing information, under the premise that it pays to be skeptical of those in power.

This bill was tried before, and it was vetoed by then-President Bill Clinton. As usual, its proponents are throwing out dire warnings about leaks that are compromising the nation at a time of war, as well as a good measure of assurances that the bill won't punish reporters or news outlets who publish leaked information — only the official people who do the leaking.

That's scant reassurance at a time when prosecutors and judges are aggressively requiring reporters to turn over notes, tapes and other information in an effort to get at leakers. When the government erects fortified walls around the things it does and releases only that which makes it look good, the public ultimately suffers.

Interestingly, the list of co-sponsors of this bill includes Orrin Hatch and Bob Bennett, Utah's two senators. We're sorry to see that. The bill is little more than an emotional rant that goes way beyond what is needed to protect legitimate national secrets.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

...looking for Utah in the BCS ranking. We seemed to have replaced them....

Top performers: Nick Rimando

Without Rimando there is no championship run, no conference final, certainly...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

...and then rise and shout, because the Cougars are out--on top.

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

Citing a classless act (assuming it is true) by one or a few Utah fans, Hall...

We should all be nice. I'll tell you what is really nice, 3 out of 4 wins.

He played always that way. Why yo mimicking?

My opinion of you rose ten fold. Thank you

You have great courage. We think you are great.

BYU is champion of the state

As a BYU fan, I did not like Max's comments at all. The biggest thing I...

BYU is champion of the state

I've been out of Utah for 17 years and still love the annual Holy War. The...

Advertisements