From Deseret News archives:

Book of Mormon as 'literature'

Forum to shift focus on possibility of it being fine reading

Published: Friday, Aug. 4, 2006 7:53 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Since it was first published in 1830, the Book of Mormon has drawn both praise and scorn from those with a vested interest in promoting it as either legitimate ancient scripture or a brilliant fraud.

But a scholarly panel discussion scheduled Wednesday at 7 p.m. in the Salt Lake City Library auditorium will examine the book from a variety of secular perspectives including as a piece of "folk literature."

"Rediscovering the American Bible: An Invitation to Share the Book of Mormon from New Perspectives" seeks to open a "dialogue of honest inquiry and good will," according to Mark Thomas, one of the event's organizers and a faculty member at Brigham Young University.

Panelists joining Thomas include Phyllis Tickle, noted Episcopal author and Publisher's Weekly religion editor; Robert Price, a New Testament scholar and member of the "Jesus Seminar"; Robert Rees, former editor of "Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought"; and Richard Bushman, LDS historian and author of the recently released book, "Joseph Smith: Rough Rolling Stone."

Story continues below
Thomas said the event grew out of discussions among several of the scholars who have come together each summer the past four years as the Book of Mormon Round Table, which is seeking to compile and edit several scholarly papers to be published in book form, explaining the book to an educated audience.

The result is planned as "an introductory text that provides an eclectic approach" to the book, "utilizing the tools that one would use to interpret any text well: historical criticism, textual criticism and literary criticism, among others."

Thomas said the forum is open to anyone "who wants to have a discussion in good faith," but won't be an arena for bashing the book or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

To date, the book "has been used almost exclusively as a rite of passage into Mormonism. Essentially, the book has been buried by consensus and is still a buried text" when it comes to an wide public understanding of it, he said.

The panel — which is sponsored by the Center for Documentary Arts/The Leonardo — doesn't seek to defend the antiquity of the book, but to examine whether it is worth reading "and why or why not? The fact that you label it 'ancient' doesn't necessarily mean that it's worth reading," he said.

"It seems to me the fundamental issue about the Book of Mormon is that it has the possibility of being a life-changing book. Why do we have to decide exactly where it came from before you can read it? Some people think 'You've got to believe it's ancient or we're not talking to you.' I disagree with that."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

So, Sean Penn and Danny Glover really consider this guy to be a hero? Tells...

You are obviously not a true Utah fan...let me guess you jumped aboard after...

Ann, you always make me laugh, but it's not too often you make me cry. Thank...

Big Green Tractor | 10:43 a.m Who was in office that divided our forces in a...

Way to go boys. Keep up the hard work. The result will be the same this...

Richfield Wildcats football preview

hows that shoulder cam?

Stampede nothing. We are going to take you guys out this saturday and capture...

Letters: Liberal rant amusing

Great letter, Robert.

Hypocrisy - yes, and when the people of his town found out, they voted him...

12 high schools ready for 'The Turf'

you have been all year, "best team in 4a" "this is our year". ever since...

Advertisements
Advertisement