From Deseret News archives:

Bush's veto power nips U.S. funds for stem-cell research

Hatch calls it a 'terrible mistake,' reacts with a middle-ground plan

Published: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:57 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
"They remind us of what is lost when embryos are destroyed in the name of research. They remind us that we all begin our lives as a small collection of cells. And they remind us that in our zeal for new treatments and cures, America must never abandon our fundamental morals," Bush added.

He said the bill would have crossed a moral line and "once crossed, we would find it impossible to turn back."

Hatch said that while he supports Bush's desire for more adoptions of frozen embryos, "7,000 to 20,000 of them are destroyed each year. How can you allow 7,000 to 20,000 of these spare embryos to be destroyed a year, yet consider it murder to use them for research to benefit mankind? Either way, they are being destroyed."

Hatch said he had discussed his proposed compromise with the White House on Wednesday. "They didn't say they couldn't do it, but they didn't say they would either," he said. "This could be done tomorrow if the White House wanted to. But they need to think it through."

In the failed attempt to override the veto in the House, 51 Republicans joined 183 Democrats and one independent to seek the override, while 179 Republicans and just 14 Democrats opposed it. Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, voted for the override — but Reps. Chris Cannon and Rob Bishop, R-Utah, opposed it.

Story continues below
Matheson said he sought the override because stem-cell research offers tremendous promise. "How long must people wait for these breakthroughs? I am disappointed that the president chose this bill as his first-ever veto target."

Cannon said, "We should never sacrifice life in the pursuit of science."

Bishop said, "If this bill was to become law, American taxpayers — for the first time ever — would be forced to pay for research that requires the destruction of human life. We should not cross this moral and ethical line, no matter how noble the end goal may appear."

Hatch and Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah, were among relatively few Republicans who supported the bill. Hatch argued that frozen embryos are not human life, unless they are implanted in a mother's womb.

Bush has made 141 veto threats during his 5 1/2 years in office, and the Republicans controlling Congress typically respond by changing bills to his liking. Only Thomas Jefferson had served longer as president before first using his veto power.


Contributing: Associated Press

E-mail: lee@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

I believe lobbyists are the ones that need to have ethics imposed upon them....

This is just embarassing. The debate is over. Global warming is a hoax.

Utah/BYU rivalry can be more civil

I just had a great idea.....nuetral site....play the game on a neutral...

Nothing new in this headline.

Boy did they (BCS)get it WRONG? NO WAY Texas should be #2 and playing...

The irony is pathetic and comical -- All these LISTS OF VIRTUES posted by...

Cougars going back to Vegas

I am happy (and not complaining) that Vegas picks BYU vs Bronco's alma mater...

Letters: Unusual TRAX gift

Mileage Fee for Automobiles | 2:50 a.m. Do you really think that we don't...

Letters: Global warming a lie

Red Shirt frequently cites articles and when I look them up I find his...

Feds mull mustang relocation plan

Don't turn wild horses into the American equivalent of the "sacred cows of...

Advertisements