From Deseret News archives:
Why are women outperforming men on campus?
It seems that on campus, men are more prone to partying, women to . . . acing their classes. And these trends, which hold across race and economic lines but are most pronounced within minority and lower-income groups, are now significantly affecting college life across the country.
Yes, there are a lot of guys doing well, even exceptionally well, in college. But the trend is otherwise. Women now make up 58 percent of those in our colleges and universities; in some places, their ratio is 2 to 1. They are a majority in graduate schools. And they win most of the places on honors lists. (Yes, men are more likely to graduate from college than they were two decades ago, but socially speaking that's not the achievement it was two decades ago.)
Today, "they (college men) have a sense of lassitude, a lack of focus," William Pollack, director of the Center for Men and Young Men at Harvard Medical School, told the Times. Wrote Lewin: "In dozens of interviews on three campuses . . . male and female students alike agreed that the slackers in their midst were mostly male, and that the fireballs were mostly female."
"So what?" some elite have said in response to the news story. If men were ahead of women educationally, as was the case for so long, would anyone care? Maybe, some argue, women are just doing what they always do when they get a shot at something they multitask, take it seriously and succeed.
Flash-forward in life, and here's what may be at least part of the answer to the "so what" question the "multitasking" observation does make a lot of sense to me. It seems that women can survive and even prosper in almost any kind of a social structure, and good for them.
The problem is that men can't.
Women, for the most part, are inherently, well, pretty darn civilized. In general, it doesn't "matter" if we have a man in our lives in the sense that we are still going to work hard, we're not going to be violent or sexually aggressive, we are going to take care of our children.
Yes, some of those things have changed, particularly the "sexually aggressive" part, because of expectations that women should behave more like men. But that's part of my point.
Comments
- Miss. teen follows where mission leads 12:17 p.m.
- Kennedy center seeking China teachers 12:17 p.m.
- Guatemalan Mormons serve children 12:16 p.m.
- Study looks at braces for scoliosis 11:49 a.m.
- Tips for trimming the tree 11:47 a.m.
- Video game expands alien world 11:46 a.m.
- Robotic hamsters are new craze 11:36 a.m.
- Your holidays on a budget 11:35 a.m.
- Buck Rogers' serial again on DVD 11:34 a.m.
- Stocks slide on Dubai debt fallout 11:32 a.m.
- BYU would like friendlier rivalry
262 - Protests against Phoenix LDS temple
211 - RSL wins MLS Cup on penalty kicks
202 - Bronco, Kyle rubber match
139 - Thunder rolls by Jazz
136 - Letters: Rushing to judge Palin
133 - Boys basketball rankings
120 - Editorial: Poor welcome for Palin
112 - Man trapped in Nutty Putty cave dies
104 - Hall, Johnson matchup key
102
Unlike you, "their" implies both democrats and republicans. Unlike you, I...
I think its really irresponsible to take scouts there.
In 2003 and 2004, I visited every residence in Clearfield City twice in my...
I have cringed everytime he gets the ball for the past two years, but can't...
As one of Jane's many friends, I want to tell you how much I loved this...
Hall will choke again. He has no composure. A little pressure and he gets...
The only way BwhineU wins 10 games this season is if they win their bowl...
Guess this writer is living in fantasy land. LaVelle wanted the darker blue...
Sorry to burst your bubble. New York, New Orleans and Los Angeles would not...
No way WSU is good enough to beat BYU in provo this year, and I'm a WSU fan....


You can be the first to comment on this story.