From Deseret News archives:

Lands bill: For preservation or profit?

Dixie residents at odds over proposal's impact on area

Published: Saturday, July 15, 2006 11:46 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
ST. GEORGE — Proposed legislation that would allow Washington County to sell up to 25,000 acres of public lands and distribute the proceeds to other projects within the county doesn't sit well with La Verkin resident Nina Fitzgerald.

"I'm one of many residents with concerns about the wording of this bill," said Fitzgerald, who is a member of a newly formed group, Citizens for Dixie's Future. "The vagueness of it and the lack of specifics is really concerning. There seems to be a lack of transparency with the bill."

Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah, and Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, introduced the Washington County Growth and Conservation Act of 2006 in Congress this past week. They first unveiled the measure on March 22 at a news conference in St. George. Community leaders, elected officials and other public employees heralded the draft legislation as a positive step forward in land-use planning.

"This is an exciting time. We've had 20 different stakeholders at the table, at the meetings and on the ground, all working together on this for two years," said Washington County Commissioner Alan Gardner. "Other Utah counties are anxious to see what happens."

But soon after the draft was released to the public, opposition mounted and has become national, with environmentalists calling the measure a massive sell-off of federal public lands.

Story continues below
The Utah Wilderness Coalition and a host of other environmental groups charge that passage of the bill, as it is now written, would fuel unneeded, expansive development in Washington County. The coalition includes the Sierra Club, the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, the Wasatch Mountain Club and the Wilderness Society.

"The more that I look at this, it seems it's really not so much about the land. It's about selling the land and capturing the revenue," said Lawson LeGate, the Sierra Club's senior Southwest regional representative. "It's really a matter of choice. Do we treat public lands as a heritage and treasure, or do we treat it as a cash cow?"

National concern

Gardner bristles at any suggestion that the county is selling off its heritage to the highest bidder.

"I don't know that anybody's getting rich off of this bill," said Gardner, a rancher who also holds federal grazing permits within the county. "If we're not going to have any more growth in Washington County, we might as well tell our kids, 'See you when you come back to visit.' I think overall this bill is going to help the entire county."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

Dane Leavitt, left, and Brad Barber hike on property above Zion National Park.

previousnext

Latest comments

Max embarrassed BYU and the LDS church. Something must be done to reign in...

Letters: Therapy for Hall

Yes, "All Knowing | 12:48 p.m.", I don't see where he's comming from. I...

Hall reprimanded by MWC

Shame on you! What Max did was dispicable, extremely selfish, and completely...

We will probably lose. Those are two of the few that play some defense....

Hall reprimanded by MWC

as an aside to all of this, some of most dire anti max hall comments that i...

Buy where you get the best price for the quality and service. It keeps...

I am a BYU fan and an alumnus of BYU but was very disappointed on the...

Letters: Left-wing AP

'Because anyone can see that it's a formula that's well worked for the gay...

You can thank God all you want for your success, however it is neither the...

Hall's pain reflects self-betrayal

Amy - Very articulate, well written opinion! As an out-of-state BYU fan, I...

Advertisements