From Deseret News archives:

Lands bill: For preservation or profit?

Dixie residents at odds over proposal's impact on area

Published: Saturday, July 15, 2006 11:46 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
ST. GEORGE — Proposed legislation that would allow Washington County to sell up to 25,000 acres of public lands and distribute the proceeds to other projects within the county doesn't sit well with La Verkin resident Nina Fitzgerald.

"I'm one of many residents with concerns about the wording of this bill," said Fitzgerald, who is a member of a newly formed group, Citizens for Dixie's Future. "The vagueness of it and the lack of specifics is really concerning. There seems to be a lack of transparency with the bill."

Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah, and Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, introduced the Washington County Growth and Conservation Act of 2006 in Congress this past week. They first unveiled the measure on March 22 at a news conference in St. George. Community leaders, elected officials and other public employees heralded the draft legislation as a positive step forward in land-use planning.

"This is an exciting time. We've had 20 different stakeholders at the table, at the meetings and on the ground, all working together on this for two years," said Washington County Commissioner Alan Gardner. "Other Utah counties are anxious to see what happens."

But soon after the draft was released to the public, opposition mounted and has become national, with environmentalists calling the measure a massive sell-off of federal public lands.

Story continues below
The Utah Wilderness Coalition and a host of other environmental groups charge that passage of the bill, as it is now written, would fuel unneeded, expansive development in Washington County. The coalition includes the Sierra Club, the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, the Wasatch Mountain Club and the Wilderness Society.

"The more that I look at this, it seems it's really not so much about the land. It's about selling the land and capturing the revenue," said Lawson LeGate, the Sierra Club's senior Southwest regional representative. "It's really a matter of choice. Do we treat public lands as a heritage and treasure, or do we treat it as a cash cow?"

National concern

Gardner bristles at any suggestion that the county is selling off its heritage to the highest bidder.

"I don't know that anybody's getting rich off of this bill," said Gardner, a rancher who also holds federal grazing permits within the county. "If we're not going to have any more growth in Washington County, we might as well tell our kids, 'See you when you come back to visit.' I think overall this bill is going to help the entire county."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

Dane Leavitt, left, and Brad Barber hike on property above Zion National Park.

previousnext

Latest comments

So, what is your explanation for the success of taking out Syria's nuclear...

Nice picture of the rim being defended, any picture with a jazz player...

4A: Timpview wins 4th in 4 years

They dominated Springville a lot better than TV did, and using TV logic,...

Now we get to be more like Europe. The Euro which started even with the...

It will indeed be interesting to see how Governor Herbert will cut nearly $1...

Editorial: Hold the line on taxes

I'm all for a modest tax increase if it will protect my child's classroom and...

I have appreciated the professionalism of AK. He seems focused in the game,...

Jazz outlast Pistons in overtime

Call it whatever you choose, but it was in my opinion a gutsy win! Now, this...

Hatch, Bennett oppose health bill

Thank you both for standing up against this horrendous scheme which will...

I, representative of many, would like to purchase less government service....

Advertisements