From Deseret News archives:

Audit is next for e-vote

Panel to evaluate the November tallies on ATM-style machines

Published: Sunday, July 2, 2006 12:15 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
State elections officials plan to take one more step — and the most important — to ensure the accuracy and security of electronic voting.

Sometime this summer, Lt. Gov. Gary Herbert plans to organize an audit committee to evaluate the votes cast on the ATM-style machines during the November general election, said Joe Demma, Herbert's chief of staff. Although the audit procedures are currently undetermined, it would most likely be conducted administratively by the state elections office.

"As long as we're in this office, we want to do everything we can to ensure the security of the vote," Demma said.

The extent of the audit would depend heavily on the associated costs, especially since there is no specific money appropriated for the audit. It is likely, however, that they will seek funding from the Legislature next year for future elections.

They may also try to pass a law requiring the audits, although Demma said that the problem with any law would be in the specifics. Because the machines are new and only a few states have conducted audits, the procedures are still being developed.

"We don't know what will work and what won't work," he said. "But we hope to use this one go-around to determine some of the better methods."

Story continues below
Audits of the machines are one of the best ways to protect against fraud and malfunctions, and without them even machines with a paper receipt — such as the ones used in Utah, which are manufactured by Diebold Elections Systems — are extremely vulnerable, according to a report from the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University Law School. The report, which was released Tuesday, demonstrates how an election could be manipulated using almost any type of electronic voting machine. But a properly conducted audit will "go a long way towards making the least difficult attacks more difficult," the report stated.

Lawrence Norden, associate counsel for the Brennan Center and chair of the task force that put together the study, said audits need to be "random and transparent" and happen as quickly as possible after an election to be effective. There also needs to be a clear chain of command for the machines and paper receipts.

Any audit should include a count of the votes cast on the paper receipts and in the machines, as well as a comparison of the votes cast on the machines within a precinct to the number of voters who registered. Auditors can also look for other signs of malfunction or malfeasance, such as a high number of canceled ballots.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

Voting machines are extremely vulnerable without an audit system, a recently released report says.

previousnext

Latest comments

Perhaps Hall isn't the greatest quarterback ever, but he is a solid...

Letters: Sodom and Gomorrah

So, I suppose we can ignore Genesis 19 that clearly states at least one other...

Let the haters talk. Go RSL!!!!

TCU is playing like the national champ. I think they are better right now...

TCU 55, Utah 28

spoutin off about the UTES loss when they ought to be "shut" for their...

To have students write on something they probably no little about does not...

Letters: Sodom and Gomorrah

When did the definition of ‘bigot’ change from prejudice...

Johnson fired up to burn old team

I loved Clint's reaction to his PK after Blanco's fist pump.

... the defense gave up "only" 48 points (pick six in 2nd qtr). Another 14...

The reason BYU is still ranked after two beatings at home is because they...

Advertisements
Advertisement