From Deseret News archives:

Phone impairs drivers

U. researchers say talking on cell is as risky as driving drunk

Published: Friday, June 30, 2006 12:05 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
People who talk on cell phones while they drive are as impaired as drunken drivers, according to researchers at the University of Utah. And it's not a matter of handheld vs. hands-free, either.

"People are as impaired when they drive and talk on a cell phone as they are when they drive intoxicated at the legal blood-alcohol limit" of 0.08 percent, said study co-author Frank Drews, an assistant professor of psychology.

The study by U. psychology professor David Strayer; Dennis Crouch, a research associate professor of pharmacology and toxicology; and Drews was published Thursday in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

For the study, 40 participants each "drove" a simulator four times: once undistracted, once using a handheld cell phone, once while on a hands-free cell phone and once while intoxicated to the legal limit from drinking vodka and orange juice.

Results were virtually the same for handheld and hands-free phones. Dialing or digging through a purse to find a ringing phone increased impairment, but the type of phone did not.

Story continues below
Compared with undistracted drivers, cell-phone users in the study drove a little slower, were 9 percent slower to hit the brakes, had 24 percent variation in following distance, were 19 percent slower returning to normal speed after braking and were more apt to crash.

Three of them rear-ended a simulated pace car while talking on cell phones.

The drunken drivers drove more slowly than both undistracted drivers and those on the cell phones, but they were more aggressive, following more closely and twice as likely to brake just four seconds before a crash would have occurred. They also hit their brakes with 23 percent more force. Accident rates, reaction time to a car braking in from of them and getting back up to speed after braking were about the same as that of undistracted drivers.

As for why none of the drunken drivers got into accidents, Drew and Strayer think that because the tests were conducted in the mornings, participants were drunk, but well-rested and in the "up" phase of intoxication. A news release for the study said that 80 percent of all fatal alcohol-related accidents occur between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m., when fatigue compounds the problem. And average blood-alcohol levels in those accidents are twice the legal limit.

Some people don't see why talking on a cell phone is any different from talking to a passenger in a vehicle, Drews said.

The problem, he said, comes from "talking to someone who is not present."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Jim Moulin

A student talks on a hands-free cell phone while operating a driving simulator used in U. study.

previousnext

Latest comments

@Lew Jeppson 1:10 p.m.: "In the context of the times it was the John Birch...

What Tiger has done is truly tragic for him and especially for his wife and...

The only people in favor of this horrible health care bill are those who...

Gee, another journalist who doesn't "get" Sarah Palin. Really? Sounds like...

I've never seen a sharper looking uniform than the old royal blue's. The...

Sterling Nesbit. Best. Scientist. Name. Ever. "At that time, the part of...

This is typical of another BCS mess. Athletes who transfer to another school...

Not preassigned? That stinks. this time my husband will not be going with me...

best of luck tiger, youv'e dug a deep hole but if you put the same attention...

In college sports, there are currently a few distinct blues: Navy,...

Advertisements