From Deseret News archives:

'Natural family' resolution is called 'exclusionary'

S.L. County official takes issue with Sutherland Institute

Published: Thursday, April 6, 2006 9:31 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A "natural family" resolution pushed by a local think-tank is narrow, one-sided and a proposal that is "insensitive, inhumane and exclusionary," a Salt Lake County councilwoman said Wednesday.

Jenny Wilson, a Democrat and the lone woman on the nine-member council, penned a letter to Sutherland Institute president Paul Mero Wednesday, calling his resolution on the family "dangerous to a government founded 'of the people, by the people and for the people.' "

The Sutherland Institute recently sent a letter to local municipalities urging them to support a resolution that includes the phrase "upholding the marriage of a woman to a man, and a man to a woman as ordained by God." The resolution, approved in Kanab in January, goes on to encourage homes to be open to a "full quiver of children" and young women to become "wives, homemakers and mothers."

"At a certain level, I find this document amusing, but mainly it is unnecessarily insensitive, inhumane and exclusionary," Wilson wrote.

Wilson took issues with several points in the Sutherland Institute's resolution.

• Promoting a "full quiver of children" ignores population problems around the globe and in Salt Lake County, Wilson said.

Story continues below
• The resolution is exclusionary, as the institute's "natural family" omits single adults, homosexuals and small families, she said. Local government leaders should not support policies for one group while ignoring the other.

"It seems that the Sutherland Institute is promoting a 'people' that comprises an extremely narrow segment of our society and our state," Wilson wrote. "It is mean-spirited towards those who, either by their own choosing, or by circumstances beyond their control, find themselves outside your definition."

Wilson said elected officials have an obligation to support a quality of life for everyone, no matter race, gender or sexual orientation. A healthy debate about the resolution might do some good in local government. "However, I have confidence that my fellow elected officials, regardless of their political persuasion, would recognize that endorsing this proposal would be a gross disservice to the people of our county."


E-mail: ldethman@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Um, championship or no, the stadium is still a big mistake. The finances...

Civilian trial for accused terrorist

. . . is what we had prior to January 20, 2009. NOW we've escaped that....

Cougars turn focus to dreaded rivals

Home field left when ByU got 2 beat downs this year. ByU barely beat SDSU and...

5A: Miners' Cantwell makes name

I am sorry that you missed the sarcastic undertone in the message. Of course...

Beck represents one side of the ongoing Republican civil war; people like Jon...

Do you remember 11/22/63?

JimP-you aren't so old. I remember when Hitler attacked Poland. I was 9 yrs...

I would have thought we would have had more Temples in Phillipines since...

Police link alcohol to murder

I have known Michelle for 40 years. I went to high school with her for the...

"No one-not even one who has not heard of the Bible or of Christ has an...

Utah Utes whip SDSU

The yewts are great at RUNNING UP THE SCORE! Look what they did to Wyo....

Advertisements