From Deseret News archives:

Activists blast Dixie land-use bill

Published: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:20 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
ST. GEORGE — A coalition of three environmental groups on Tuesday blasted proposed federal legislation that seeks to manage public lands in Washington County, saying the measure would eliminate protections now in place for wilderness study areas and pave the way for further sprawl.

Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah, and Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, unveiled the draft legislation last week in St. George. Highlights of the Washington County Growth and Conservation Act of 2006 include selling about 25,000 acres of public land and using 15 percent of the proceeds for public education, water projects and fire and flood protection. The other 85 percent of the money would be earmarked to preserve historic rangeland and vital watersheds, protect endangered species like the desert tortoise, and improve conservation efforts on numerous projects throughout the county.

Utility corridors would also be designated for protection, and a system of trails would be set aside for public use. More than 219,000 acres would be added to the National Wilderness Preservation System.

Story continues below
But the Sierra Club, the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance and the Wilderness Society said that falls far short of the roughly 300,000 acres of wilderness-quality land in Washington County that could be protected. They joined together Tuesday, as the Utah Wilderness Coalition, to voice concerns about the plan. They said the legislation proposes wilderness protection for less than 30 percent of the deserving lands in the region. It also requires a massive sale of federal public lands and opens the way for many new roads, utility corridors and water-development projects.

"As written, this bill not only shortchanges wilderness protection but also puts a real estate sign out on prized open spaces around St. George," said Lawson LeGate, senior southwest regional representative of the Sierra Club, in a written statement. "This proposed giveaway of such a massive amount of precious public lands, and without prior identification in a public planning process, is of deep concern to us."

The three environmental groups plan to meet with Bennett next week in Washington to discuss their concerns. "It would be a great mistake to push these half-baked ideas through Congress given the values at stake," said Scott Groene, executive director of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, in a written statement. "This legislation needs involvement by all citizens and significant work."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Did you scream as loud or louder than the teenaged girls on opening night...

BYU would like friendlier rivalry

I'm a BYU fan who watched from the north end zone LES when the Ute...

Why do all mormons hate gays? Didn't Jesus teach us to love all people?...

Letters: Don't buy it

What about the CBO estimate that this bill will actually SAVE us around 150...

Best prep football games of 2009

How much do these writers even know about the 1a 2a? Not enough to decide if...

It's so frustrating reading the haters comments. It's unimaginable that in...

Real Salt Lake: Fandemonium

Way to go RSL!!! You guys are heros!!! Love watching and supporting you!...

H1N1 vaccines pulled in Canada

Just like in America to. No difference. If I lived in Utah, I would get on...

Letters: Time for health reform?

"Everyone in Washington knows the reform plan will cost much more than the...

To "@redshirt | 9:09 a.m." what have I said that is streching rality?...

Advertisements