From Deseret News archives:

Polygamists riding gays' coattails?

Christian group says same-sex court victories 'paving the way'

Published: Saturday, March 18, 2006 10:05 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Talk about strange bedfellows. A conservative Christian values group says polygamists are piggybacking on recent court victories for gay rights in an attempt to decriminalize plural marriage.

Carrie Gordon Earll, director of Issues Analysis for the Colorado-based Focus on the Family, puts it this way: "You can't change the definition of marriage to allow one exception and not allow other exceptions."

Earll said limited court victories by same-sex couples are "paving the way" for polygamists and polyandrists, who are also eying the court systems as venues for their agendas.

"It's really getting to where I think we need to take it a little more seriously because it's possible they will follow the same path taken by the same-sex marriage advocates," Earll said. "It's the same argument that will be put forth."

Pro-polygamy activists deny riding anybody's coattails.

"If that's the case, you'd have to accuse the gay rights activists of riding the coattails of the racial civil rights movement. It's a human rights effort," said Mary Batchelor with the pro-polygamy group Principle Voices. "We are going to use civil rights as an issue that's valuable to us."

Story continues below
At the same time, Michael Marriott of the board of governors of the national gay-rights advocacy group Human Rights Campaign, stressed that the gay and lesbian community isn't advocating for plural marriage.

"I cannot believe that there is a comparison," Marriott said. "We're fighting for the same rights as same-sex couples, so that one couple has the same rights as taxpaying citizens as every other couple enjoys."

Bill Duncan, director of the Provo-based Marriage Law Foundation, which supports traditional marriage, acknowledged that the same argument for redefining marriage to include same-sex couples could also be used to legalize plural marriage.

"I think that both are a troubling development, because they both create very significant changes in the way we understand marriage," he said.

However, Duncan said as a practical matter, "I don't think you can predict that one is going to occur as a result of the other."

Members of the anti-polygamy group Tapestry Against Polygamy agreed.

"I don't think they're ever going to decriminalize polygamy," said Rowenna Erickson, a former plural wife. "They've been trying to lump polygamy with gays and lesbians forever. They're totally different. Polygamy is not going to be tolerated by the state of Utah, the people themselves (or) the United States."

Erickson said polygamists will not be making any alliance with gay rights groups anytime soon.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Senator Stephenson isn't proposing raising the tax on the poor. He creating...

We need answers from Hasan

You are deeply deluded.

In one sentence you hit the nail on the head about what is wrong with your...

Democrats talk big about charity, but did you know that Republicans actually...

Letters: Will wrong on warming

Warmer temperatures would be disastrous for Utah. We already struggle to get...

Remember the favorite mantra of "Bush Derangement Syndrome" coming from the...

Letters: Case of sour grapes

I'm not a conservative but I always respected the intellectual underpinnings...

Letters: Will wrong on warming

There is now confirmed data of the actual temps and co2 compiled by an MIT...

How stupid does it get? We can choose to call a people 'Latino' for any...

Spoken like a true user/loser. How much recouse do you think landlords have...

Advertisements
Advertisement