From Deseret News archives:

Child health study may never begin

Bush's budget may stop the largest-ever effort before it starts

Published: Wednesday, Feb. 8, 2006 9:11 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Long-term study of children's health has been largely ignored, said Dr. Scott Williams, a pediatrician who works for HealthInsight and is not directly involved in the National Children's Study.

For many years, even clinical trials of potential treatments that might be used on children only enrolled adult participants, as if children were just small-scale adults. Now drugs and other treatments that might be used by children must have a child component to the testing.

And while there have been many short-term studies focused on treating diseases in children, Williams said, a longitudinal study like the planned study provides long-term, cause-and-effect information that is difficult to piece together any other way.

"We have this concern: There are things in our environment that may contribute to diseases long-term," Williams said. Such a study could provide some answers; it could perhaps even help sort out questions of nature v. nurture.

"I'm very disappointed this was defunded," Williams said.

Clark said the expected cost — about $70 million this coming year to get going and another $150 million a year to carry it out, seems like a small amount compared to the billions that are spent each year on children's health problems. "I really think a country that fails to invest in its children is morally bankrupt," he said.

Story continues below

Fleischman acknowledged unusual financial challenges this year, such as hurricanes like Katrina that have dramatically impacted the federal deficit. "But this was really an outrageous directive," he said.

And there is apparently some money available for research. A study to be conducted by the Human Genome Institute appears in the president's budget with an allocation of $68 million — an allocation almost identical to the amount previously expected for the children's study.

"That is not a study about children," said Fleischman. "It's about adults. Children are again being ignored, and it's short-sighted to ignore children who, of course, become adults. Our study could answer questions about predisposition to disease by managing factors that impact on future health."

The genetic study, proposed by the Department of Health and Human Services, says it will look at genetic and environmental factors of diseases, with only a small component concerning children, Fleischman said.


E-mail: lois@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Oh,please. The only reason 69% of those surveyed approve of it is because...

You really can't blame Max for being jealous. After all, the Utes...

Letters: Taxing rich doesn't help

On the flip side, taxing the rich doesn't hurt either. Taxing the poor does.

So, you propose we go back to living without energy? This is the problem...

Iam glad byu won but I'm not happy with max there are somethings you just...

Big Deal. Game is over. Move on. It's Football! Take the religion thing...

Max, A negative 150!

No. 1 vs. No. 2 in SEC title game

we will never know who is truly #1 and #2 without a playoff system. The SEC...

Baseball player on mission in Wash.

You wanna start throwing football in the mix too... Austin Collie!!!!! That's...

I'm so glad Max Hall is done, can we please get a division-1 athlete to play...

Advertisements