From Deseret News archives:

Lawmakers taking look at gift card expirations

HB324 would make certificates over $25 good for 5 years

Published: Thursday, Feb. 2, 2006 11:55 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
When is a gift certificate not a gift certificate?

Buy one, wait a few years to try to redeem it and you might find out.

Gift certificate expiration is the topic of HB324, which was discussed but not voted on by the House Business and Labor Committee on Thursday. The bill would prohibit a gift certificate — meaning a certificate, electronic card or other medium — worth $25 or more from expiring within five years after it is issued.

The bill's sponsor, Rep. Larry Wiley, D-West Valley, said many people receive gift certificates tucked away in wedding cards but only discover them later.

"Five years just seems like a reasonable amount of time that a person would need to use a certificate," he told the committee. "I myself have had occasions where I've received gift certificates and put them on my top drawer, and my wife has put things on top of it and I just forget about it. And when you do some spring cleaning-type things, you come across it."

Story continues below
Some legislators questioned both the $25 threshold and five-year period. Rep. Curtis Oda, R-Clearfield, said five years "makes it very difficult for a business that issues a certificate to track, and it becomes an accounting nightmare."

Rep. Craig Frank, R-Pleasant Grove, wondered if the $25 amount would result in merchants instead issuing gift certificates in smaller denominations to avoid the bill's effects. Frank admitted being victimized by such an expiration when he tried to use an old certificate at a restaurant.

"I thought I was going to get a meal on the card and then — boom! — it comes time to pay the bill and I don't have access to that money because the card's expired," he said. "In my opinion, it would seem as though if certain consideration has been given . . . the contract should stay in force regardless of what the period of time is, as long as the business is still providing services or product for the lifetime.

"I understand it's a clerical issue, and I understand that there's some real heartache there having to carry over that account that continues to accrue from year to year to year to year, but a lot of that's done now with the push of a button, and the clerical aspect of that is very minor."

The committee's chairman, Rep. Stephen Clark, R-Provo, had a similar line of reasoning.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

This was the first time I have had the chance to see the COugars play this...

Lets go WebCats!!! Congrats to Coach McBride and the entire squad for making...

Hey, Melting Ice Caps, this is a massive breach of the scientific method and...

Dubai is suffering from a catastrophic property slump. But more importantly,...

UCAT still accepting public comment

DIDO!

Secret Service admits lapse

Far more likely the gate was manned by far-right wing authoritarians....

Great column! Lets all sit back and share a good laugh about some of the...

First, the Constitution is flexible because there is a provision to modify it...

Sounds like you need to call the police and have some JW's arrested for...

Incredible finish, wait a minute, Illinois was just whistled for another foul.

Advertisements