From Deseret News archives:

Lawmakers taking look at gift card expirations

HB324 would make certificates over $25 good for 5 years

Published: Thursday, Feb. 2, 2006 11:55 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
When is a gift certificate not a gift certificate?

Buy one, wait a few years to try to redeem it and you might find out.

Gift certificate expiration is the topic of HB324, which was discussed but not voted on by the House Business and Labor Committee on Thursday. The bill would prohibit a gift certificate — meaning a certificate, electronic card or other medium — worth $25 or more from expiring within five years after it is issued.

The bill's sponsor, Rep. Larry Wiley, D-West Valley, said many people receive gift certificates tucked away in wedding cards but only discover them later.

"Five years just seems like a reasonable amount of time that a person would need to use a certificate," he told the committee. "I myself have had occasions where I've received gift certificates and put them on my top drawer, and my wife has put things on top of it and I just forget about it. And when you do some spring cleaning-type things, you come across it."

Story continues below
Some legislators questioned both the $25 threshold and five-year period. Rep. Curtis Oda, R-Clearfield, said five years "makes it very difficult for a business that issues a certificate to track, and it becomes an accounting nightmare."

Rep. Craig Frank, R-Pleasant Grove, wondered if the $25 amount would result in merchants instead issuing gift certificates in smaller denominations to avoid the bill's effects. Frank admitted being victimized by such an expiration when he tried to use an old certificate at a restaurant.

"I thought I was going to get a meal on the card and then — boom! — it comes time to pay the bill and I don't have access to that money because the card's expired," he said. "In my opinion, it would seem as though if certain consideration has been given . . . the contract should stay in force regardless of what the period of time is, as long as the business is still providing services or product for the lifetime.

"I understand it's a clerical issue, and I understand that there's some real heartache there having to carry over that account that continues to accrue from year to year to year to year, but a lot of that's done now with the push of a button, and the clerical aspect of that is very minor."

The committee's chairman, Rep. Stephen Clark, R-Provo, had a similar line of reasoning.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Harline is still open...!!!

Jazz hope D-Will returns soon

i'm not sure if i can handle listening to David Locke either. maybe i just...

Letters: Utah not all rosy

A couple walked into an Open House, looked around and said, "We love the...

UTAH had won the previous 3 games against TCU. I am happy with 3 out of 4...

Haters don't waste your time and RLSers don't feed the trolls. For those...

Aggies beat Spartans in snowy Logan

Congratulations Utah State. It is good to see USU in the middle of the pack...

When did the NBA prove they are the best league in the world? I don't...

Letters: Utah not all rosy

I hear you Lindsay. Moving to Utah in the 6th grade, after living all over...

TCU creams U.

Mr. Roberts. What a stupid statement. You obviously didn't read all the...

this is so nice for us RSL fans and for the state of utah and SLC. The media...

Advertisements
Advertisement