From Deseret News archives:

Alito hearing — And now, the questions

Proceeding to shift from statements to give and take

Published: Monday, Jan. 9, 2006 11:03 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Given that O'Connor was the swing vote on many of the most heatedly debated social issues, including abortion, the death penalty, affirmative action and religion, the stakes this time are perhaps even higher for the court, the two parties and advocates on both sides than during the battle last year over the nomination of John G. Roberts Jr., who was confirmed as chief justice Sept. 29 with half the Senate's Democrats supporting him.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., called Alito's potential seat on the bench "pivotal" and said she wanted clear answers on his position on Roe v. Wade and abortion and civil rights.

Current Judiciary Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said there is no firm rule on how much a nominee must say to be confirmed and although he considers it "inappropriate to ask a nominee how he would vote on a specific matter likely to come before the court," senators may ask whatever they want.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said the judge has an obligation to answer questions on topics he has written about, telling Alito that, "Most of the familiar arguments for ducking direct questions no longer apply and certainly don't apply in your case."

Schumer said the validity of the position that Alito could not speak on any issue that was likely to come before him "vanishes when the nominee has a written record, as you do, on so many subjects."

Story continues below
"On the issue of choice, for example, because you've already made blanket statements about your view of the Constitution, and your support for overruling Roe, you've already given the suggestion of prejudgment on a question that will likely come before the court," Schumer said. "So I respectfully submit you cannot use that as a basis for not answering."

Alito made his opening statement to the senators Monday, about 3 1/2 hours after the hearing started.

His 11-minute remarks gave a brief outline of his past, including how he felt when he moved from being an attorney to a judge.

"A judge can't have any agenda, a judge can't have any preferred outcome in any particular case and a judge certainly doesn't have a client," Alito said in his first statement to the committee Monday. "The judge's only obligation — and it's a solemn obligation — is to the rule of law. And what that means is that in every single case, the judge has to do what the law requires."

The hearing will continue today and for the rest of the week. Specter wants the committee to vote on Alito's nomination Jan. 17.


Contributing: Richard W. Stevenson and Neil A. Lewis, New York Times News Service

E-mail: suzanne@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Jim Watson, AFP/Getty Images

U.S. Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito testifies Monday before senators in an opening hearing that provided no fireworks.

previousnext

Latest comments

The only thing that Max Hall should be a finalist for is "loud mouth" or...

I agree with Tami. You can't force those with no math aptitude to learn...

Mormon Messages on YouTube

Where does say God is not both? God has a Body and is a Spirit. It is...

2nd gay bishop for Episcopalians

Afraid? Religious institutions are not "afraid" of people who are different....

Bennett seeks to stall N-waste bill

. . . because it appears because I didn't donate more than $49,000 to Senator...

USU shows clear improvment

Utah State will take BYU to the wire... You heard it here first.

I agree with Cosmo, these professors are green with envy! They've never...

Boozer on an offensive tear

...and still Boozer gets no love from the Jazz faithfull. With all the...

Did the snowy roads cause the problem or was it bad drivers who don't know...

USU shows clear improvment

Can recruit some great athletes. We will never compete against Boise, Utah or...

Advertisements