Another year of Christmas warfare has come and gone and Rutherford Institute President John W. Whitehead already is having mischievous thoughts about 2006.
There's no reason to think these Christmas clashes will stop anytime soon, especially not in an election year. But if Americans are going to keep fighting about Christmas, Whitehead thinks their civic leaders should at least create some constructive debates at the grass-roots level where they'll do some good.
What they could do in 2006, he said, with a laugh, is put signs under their big public trees that proclaim, "Formerly known as a Christmas tree."
Then everyone would get mad with good cause.
"So is it a 'Christmas tree' or a 'community tree' or what? Someone has to make that decision," said Whitehead. "The problem is that if people in your community want to call it a 'community tree,' they have every right to call it a 'community tree.' But if the people in your community want to call it a 'Christmas tree,' they have every right to call it a 'Christmas tree.'
"People are going to have to talk to each other and work things like that out. There's no way around it."
The irony, said Whitehead, is that legal strategists who often disagree about other church-state conflicts agree that America's laws are not all that confusing when it comes to "December dilemma" conflicts in the public square.
A veteran leader on the progressive side of Baptist life agrees. According to J. Brent Walker of the Baptist Joint Committee, which often clashes with conservatives, there is nothing wrong with calling a Christmas tree a "Christmas tree." At the height of this year's holiday warfare, he circulated a three-rule list to help public officials especially in schools negotiate this cultural minefield in future years. He noted that many liberal and conservative experts agree that:
Concerts in public schools can and should include sacred music along with secular selections, as long as the sacred does not dominate.
Dramatic productions can include religious subjects, as long as they do not involve worship and the goal is to educate about religious faiths and traditions.
"Free standing creches, as thoroughly religious Christian symbols, should not be sponsored by government, but Christmas trees and menorahs are sufficiently secular to allow their display without a constitutional problem," wrote Walker.
As this final suggestion hints, the key is that communities can celebrate Christmas, as long as their leaders do not appear to be promoting Christmas alone.
- Dangerous silence: Why you need to talk to...
- Mormons, Muslims and St. Isidore the Farmer
- Maine churches fighting gay marriage
- Hugo Chavez looks to God as cancer clouds future
- Utah churches and their events in the news
- Famed British atheist supports placing Bibles...
- Leave bias protections for gays up to voters,...
- Judge allows Shoshone tribe into faith-based...
- Notre Dame, Catholic clinics sue over...
20 - Catholic lawsuits shove contraceptive...
15 - Maine churches fighting gay marriage
13 - Dangerous silence: Why you need to talk...
7 - Mormons, Muslims and St. Isidore the...
6 - Famed British atheist supports placing...
3 - Hugo Chavez looks to God as cancer...
3 - Leave bias protections for gays up to...
3






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments