From Deseret News archives:

Main Street flap over?

ACLU's Eyer says appeal of case by Jan. 1 deadline unlikely

Published: Tuesday, Dec. 27, 2005 11:10 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
All signs indicate that one of the most divisive chapters in Salt Lake City's history may be over.

The American Civil Liberties Union has until New Year's Day to file an appeal of the dismissal of its second Main Street Plaza suit. ACLU of Utah executive director Dani Eyer said she "has voiced her opinion" to the ACLU national headquarters about continuing. However, she has not heard back from national lawyers who will ultimately decide whether to appeal the case.

While still in the dark about the final decision, Eyer says it doesn't appear as if anyone's preparing to continue the fight.

"I'm assuming I would have heard something by now if they were gearing up," she said.

The ACLU has 90 days to appeal the dismissal of its free speech and religious separation suit by the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. That decision came down Oct. 3, giving the ACLU until New Year's Day to appeal.

The initial Main Street Plaza suit came after the city sold a block of Main Street to the LDS Church in 1999 for $8.1 million. In that sale, the city reserved a public-access easement across the plaza but gave the church the authority to prohibit on-plaza protests and proselytizing, certain dress and other things the LDS Church finds offensive.

With the First Unitarian Church of Salt Lake City, among others, as plaintiffs, the ACLU of Utah sued Salt Lake City over the restrictions, and in 2002 the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver sided with the ACLU. The court said the city cannot have public access on the plaza while forbidding certain types of speech there.

After the 10th Circuit's ruling, Mayor Rocky Anderson worked with the church and other local leaders to come up with a plan in which the easement rights would be traded for two acres of church-owned land in the city's Glendale area, where a $4.5 million privately funded community center is to be built. The deal made the plaza entirely private and the city relinquished public guarantees of free expression and pedestrian passage on it.

The ACLU then filed a second suit against the city, claiming political pressure from the church and its members led the mayor, who had previously pledged not to give away public access on the plaza, to give up the city's public access easement though the plaza. Anderson's change of heart violated constitutional provisions against government favoring one religion over another, the ACLU said.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

KM | 8:16 a.m. Dec. 8, 2009 I did listen to Beck's show from last night....

Snow brings big chill

Lucky I live in Hawaii. No global warming debate here! Every day the...

Hall finished 2-1 against ur Utes and you have to live with that fact. Oh and...

AMEN!

High school girls basketball rankings

102 pts in a highschool game?? are you kidding me?? third highest score in...

Household tips for frigid weather

pour salt down them and follow with enough water to get it down the drain but...

To "Anonymous" at 946pm: Nice job at contradicting yourself there. You go...

GO South Sevier! We love you guys!!

Sorry your wrong, Utes beat a then ranked Illinois team a week ago. Best win...

The unnatural outcast

I think each mother should be free to choose what she feels is best for...

Advertisements