From Deseret News archives:

Activists sue Forest Service over snowmobile decision

Coalition claims land was alloted without proper public input

Published: Friday, Dec. 16, 2005 12:21 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Environmentalists have sued the Forest Service in federal court alleging that a decision to allow snowmobiles back into part of the Wasatch-Cache National Forest was made without proper public input and should be stopped.

A coalition of four environmental protection groups claim in the lawsuit filed Thursday that Wasatch-Cache supervisor Tom Tidwell, forest supervisor Faye Krueger and Logan District Ranger Robert Cruz failed to "adhere to requirements for public participation" when they decided to adopt a proposal to re-open portions of the Cache-Box Elder Management Area to winter motorized use.

Wasatch-Cache National Forest officials closed those areas to snowmobiles in March 2003, leaving 42 percent — nearly 540,000 acres — open to motorized use and only 1 percent closed.

Non-motorized winter recreation has always been allowed in the area, but conflicts have arisen between between groups who ski and snowmobile groups.

The problem, according to the suit, is the dispute was resolved without issuing public notices of meetings and without public comment.

Story continues below
The decision, according to Bryan Dixon, conservation chairman for the Bridgerland Audubon Society, "cut protection to non-motorized users" and gave up 4,800 acres more to motorized users. "The Forest Service caved to political pressure. They acted illegally and made an acceptance behind closed doors. We can't have that happening."

The decision has renewed the dispute as well as damaged the environment, the coalition claims.

"We're not trying to end snowmobiling," Dixon said. "We're just trying to find a small area of land with diverse terrain, that is accessible by foot, close to the roads so families can use it, relatively safe from avalanche danger and keep it available for that kind of use."

The suit asks the court to impose a temporary injunction on the implementation of the new plan until their concerns can be heard. Among those, the groups claim the plan violates the National Environmental Policy Act.

The Forest Service is expected to file a response to the suit in the coming week.

A similar lawsuit was filed in Washington, D.C., in 2004, against the National Park Service. It cited in particular decisions to allow snowmobiles in Yellowstone National Park. Since then, limits have been set on the recreation vehicles can be on the property.


E-MAIL: wleonard@desnews.com; gfattah@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Letters: Christian founders

Why would it matter what religion Washington was? The US isn't a christian...

Hey Dick - See any similarity between BYU/NM and last years Utah/TCU...

No. 22 BYU holds off pesky Lobos

Utah 45 UNM 14 YBU 24 UNM 19 Utah is 26 points better than YBU. ...

Looking good Tigers. We love you so much. Keep up the good work and bring...

The data shows the earth is cooling, not warming! But like Groucho Marks...

No. 22 BYU holds off pesky Lobos

Wow. Top-25 team, BYU is not. The MWC has really 3 classes: Class...

Can BYU root for (ick) Utah Utes?

"FACT #2: BYU has received $2.0M in charity handouts from the University of...

4 of the first 5 comments from cougar trolls. Great win for the coogs by the...

Considering that two of the high priest group leaders in my stake (at...

Letters: Science prostituted

Science is a fraud. We all know people are black because Cain killed Abel. ...

Advertisements
Advertisement