When Rep. John Dougall, R-Highland, proposes legislation that prohibits cities from hiring lobbyists, he isn't protecting taxpayers he is hurting them. A legislator should know better. Silencing city leaders only hurts the constituents they represent. This misguided proposal feeds on the misconceptions of those who are uninformed. It's time to set the record straight.
Myth No. 1: All government entities in Utah can effectively lobby Washington together through the state. Dougall says, "We don't want everyone going their own way." Hogwash. The notion that local entities should rely upon the mercy of the state's agenda is antithetical to the principle of grassroots democracy. Why would a Republican lawmaker think that a government farther from the people is better for the people? Legislators can't cry foul at the federal mandates when they turn around and neuter municipalities.
It has become an annual nightmare for cities to fend off the encroachments of new legislation in Utah. When did the principle of community self-determination lose out to the legislative micromanagement mentality?
One reason we engage in vigorous federal lobbying now is that the state can't satisfy the intense demands of local government. Either get out of the way and let communities do what they can in their best interests or get rid of cities altogether, but please don't cripple local government to the point of complete impotence. Cheap shots about government waste for political gain are easy. But study a property tax bill for the truth. While the cost of municipal services has risen exponentially over the past few decades, the revenue (by design) has remained relatively constant. That's the way it should be it keeps us humble, honest and as efficient as possible. But let's be fair. If cities across America can have Congress earmark funds to help with major projects, it would be stupid to withdraw Utah cities from the running. The money will still be earmarked, but for cities in other states.
Myth No. 2: Lobbying is somehow patently evil. Like most folks, I don't like the fact our political system demands professional lobbying. Special interests with deep pockets have better access to officials than the voters. But don't throw out the baby with the bath water. All clients and all causes are not created equal. Local government is no "special interest." It is the people. And frankly, you would be hard pressed to find more genuine and "voterlike" elected officials than in local government. We are your neighbors, for heaven's sake.
- John Florez: Let's make education's Common...
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
- Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
- Letter: Utah newspapers need to cover both...
- Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich won't...
- In our opinion: Editorial: A study on...
- Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
- Letter: Obama shows allegiance to the...
56 - Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - Letter: Obama throws a curveball
31 - Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich...
26 - Letter: Age really matters regarding...
20 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
19 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
16 - Letter: Utah newspapers need to cover...
10






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments