I paused in reading the letter from Jonathan Morrison (Forum, Dec. 1) in regard to his objections to the CP80 initiative. The unfettered proliferation of pornography has allowed these purveyors to continually erode the moral fiber of our society. It has allowed them to deploy tricks to ensnare the unsuspected. I want the choice of not having to navigate that minefield.
The education of our children is certainly appropriate. However, as a parent it's not only my responsibility to teach my children, it is also my duty to provide a safe environment for them. Just as I wouldn't want my children to be inadvertently injected with an addictive drug, I don't want them inadvertently exposed to addictive, degrading images. The CP80 solution does not affect anyone who wishes to view "questionable content." Apathy beats morality and advocacy beats apathy. Technology can be used to our benefit in a legislative manner.
Allan Smart
CP80 Foundation
Orem
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- John Florez: Let's make education's Common...
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
- Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
- Letter: Utah newspapers need to cover both...
- Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich won't...
- In our opinion: Editorial: A study on...
- Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion
- Letter: Obama shows allegiance to the...
56 - Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - Letter: Obama throws a curveball
31 - Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich...
26 - Letter: Age really matters regarding...
20 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
19 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
16 - Letter: Utah newspapers need to cover...
10






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments