From Deseret News archives:

Crosses honoring troopers protested

Atheists' suit says Utah markers unconstitutional

Published: Friday, Dec. 2, 2005 1:37 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A Texas-based atheist group has filed a federal lawsuit against the Utah Highway Patrol and the Utah Department of Transportation, demanding that crosses erected in honor of fallen UHP troopers be removed from highways on the principle of separation of church and state.

In the suit filed in U.S. District court Thursday, American Atheists Inc., a nonprofit Texas corporation with main offices based out of New Jersey, says several of the 12-foot steel crosses memorializing troopers killed in the line of duty are located on public land in violation of the establishment clause of the First Amendment.

"It is the government endorsement of religion and of one particular religion," said Mike Rivers, Utah director of American Atheists and one of the plaintiffs. Two other Utah members, Stephen Clark and Richard Andrews, have also joined the suit.

News of the suit spread quickly through the UHP community and among friends and family of fallen troopers. "Generally speaking, the crosses are to memorialize these officers who have given the ultimate sacrifice to the state," UHP spokesman Jeff Nigbur said. Nigbur said a large number of the crosses are located on private property near public highways.

As for the religious symbolism, Nigbur said, the cross symbol was chosen as a general symbol to memorialize the fallen.

Story continues below
"We chose the cross because the cross is the international sign of peace, and it has no religious significance in it," Nigbur said.

"I think that's less than honest," said Salt Lake civil rights attorney Brian Barnard, who represents the atheists.

Barnard said the cross is a symbol of Christianity. He has no objection to memorializing fallen troopers, but Barnard said there has to be a better, non-denominational way to do it.

"I don't think there's any question that these troopers should be honored. They have given the ultimate sacrifice," Barnard said. "They can be honored in a way that doesn't emphasize religion."

As for being on private property, several crosses located by Barnard are actually on government land and he has copies of permits issued by the Utah Department of Transportation that allow the crosses.

UDOT spokesman Tom Hudachko said his department has yet to fully review the suit and did not want to comment on pending litigation.

Todd Royce, former president of the Utah Highway Patrol Association, which helps place the memorial crosses, calls the suit a little late.

"This was years in the working," Royce said. "Some of these crosses have been up for seven or eight years. When we put them up, nobody opposed them."

Recent comments

In what way is a cross not religious? It is the very symbol of...

Josie | March 11, 2009 at 8:20 a.m.

Why not honor the fallen troopers with a symbol of their dedication...

Dan | March 11, 2009 at 7:59 a.m.

The cross is anything but a secular symbol. And to try to make it...

Genny | March 10, 2009 at 2:14 p.m.

Image

Marcie Robinson, niece to UHP Trooper Randy K. Ingram, takes a moment to remember her uncle.

previousnext

Latest comments

One small detail: Obama has a brain.

This greatly weakens democracy in Utah. You are creating an unelected body...

Thunder rolls by Jazz

Hey what happened to the undrafted rookie that was going to replace Miles and...

another day, another protest against the church.... (long... yawn...)

What in heaven's name. Tried to make it through your run-on rant....

Have these Utah County law enforcement dudes go work with the SLCPD and West...

Fall sports academic all-state

Every academic all state that has ever come from my school has been a good...

Its awesum for the fans cuz they won the cup; way to go! I'm still not a fan...

Thunder rolls by Jazz

When the Jazz have only half their team they play like a desperate...

As a teacher, I tend to agree. Unless it impacts his ability to read, if this...

Advertisements