Utah plans pollution forum
Hearing to focus on 'real-world outcomes' of new federal rules
To answer skeptics of new federal air pollution rules, Utah officials are holding a public forum Tuesday to compare the potential impacts on the state's air quality with current rules.
State regulators intend to adopt the new rules for about 30 larger-scale air-polluters in January, despite complaints that the changes might increase pollution.
Rick Sprott, director of Utah's Division of Air Quality, said the Salt Lake City forum will give the public a chance to study real-world outcomes.
In November, members of the Utah Air Quality Board requested a study of the regulations, known as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's New Source Review rules. At the same time, the board went forward with the state's proposal to adopt the new regulations so that Utah can meet an EPA deadline in January.
EPA's stated purpose is to make sure that power plants and other air polluters keep their emissions as low as possible even as their operations expand. Environmentalists accuse the Bush administration of weakening safeguards, making it possible for the oldest, dirtiest plants to add power-generating capacity without concern for the additional pollution that they would generate.
- Several Utah high schools moving to 4-year...
- Dangerous silence: Why you need to talk to...
- Is this dress too short? Tooele teen gets...
- Bus driver's arrest prevented potential 'mass...
- Four killed in plane crash near St. George...
- Studies try to find why poorer people are...
- Crews battling 4,000-acre fire as stormy...
- Sarah Palin catches flak over her Orrin Hatch...
- Is this dress too short? Tooele teen...
55 - Stained-glass ceiling: Study says...
36 - Orrin Hatch is now the hunted —...
30 - Billboard battle heats up as company...
29 - Sarah Palin catches flak over her Orrin...
24 - Matheson, Love engage in lively...
22 - Liljenquist TV ad aims to pressure...
20 - How will Palin endorsement affect Hatch...
20






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments