From Deseret News archives:

Kane, feds to meet soon to discuss roads issue

Feud involves hundreds of miles of routes in county

Published: Monday, Nov. 21, 2005 11:45 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Lawsuits and bluster notwithstanding, Kane County and the federal government will soon enter into negotiations to resolve a 2 1/2-year feud over ownership of hundreds of miles of dirt roads in Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. "Kane County has agreed to begin the consultation on Nov. 30, 2005," says a letter written by Gale Norton, secretary of the U.S. Interior Department.

In Kanab on Monday afternoon, Commissioner Mark Habbeshaw took a break from a County Commission meeting to confirm the upcoming session.

"I'm pretty optimistic about it," he said. "We're going to meet with Interior and the BLM (Bureau of Land Management) on Nov. 30 up there in Salt Lake, in the BLM offices, and try to see if we can't work something out."

Norton's comments came in a letter to Sen. Richard Durbin, an Illinois Democrat who demanded last June that Norton intervene in the dispute or he would hold up the confirmation of a top Norton deputy, Patricia Lynn Scarlett.

On Friday, the same day Durbin received the latest in a series of letters from Norton, Scarlett was confirmed as deputy director.

It was also the same day that Kane and Garfield counties filed a federal lawsuit challenging road closures and use restrictions in the monument's management plan. The lawsuit was described as a formality to protect the county's legal standing before the statute of limitations expired.

Durbin has been a harsh critic both of Kane County and what he saw as Interior Department inaction.

Story continues below
Last June he wrote, "This current situation is a direct consequence of the department's failure to take action against Kane County when the county removed over 30 BLM route signs nearly two years ago."

Norton responded Friday that she has appointed Larry Jensen, a federal regional solicitor, to negotiate with the county.

"While we cannot prejudge the outcome of this consultation, Mr. Jensen will articulate in this consultation the applicable and appropriate federal rights and responsibilities that apply in this situation," she wrote.

She also pledged that the department would follow guidelines set by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, which directed a "commendable spirit of mutual accommodation" and a recognition that "both levels of government have responsibility for, and a deep commitment to, the common good, which is better served by communication and cooperation than by unilateral action."

In August 2003, the BLM put up 31 signs closing off certain dirt roads in the monument. And that prompted Habbeshaw and Sheriff Lamont Smith to take the signs down, saying the county owned the routes under a 19th-century law known as RS2477.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News graphic

previousnext

Latest comments

Skateboarder stabbed at park

Whatever happened to curfews for kids? I'm not blaming the victim. But why do...

Obama, Biden, Reid, Pelosi, Barney the Frank, all....allllll.... all are...

TCU moves into 4th place in BCS

That is exactly what you zoobs were saying last year. Somehow, you think that...

Away in a manger

If you believe that God is the almighty then why worry about disbelievers? ...

@lesson one: I do not trust any politician of either party to tell the...

Becky Thomas: Find the cheese!

The article deals with the need to be flexible when crisis comes. The...

5A football: Darts edge PG

I just want to brag about something.....check out my prediction I posted on...

Jobless husbands help at home?

Though having the housework done is nice, it means much more to have my...

The only game that I have missed this year, due to my brother getting married...

What 3A team are we talking about? and what does that have to do with this year?

Advertisements
Advertisement