From Deseret News archives:

Ethics group revokes Hatch award

Published: Tuesday, Nov. 15, 2005 7:50 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
An ethics watchdog group has revoked an "Ethics Hero" award bestowed last year on Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, saying "though Senator Hatch was right about the principle involved, it has become increasingly clear that his handling of the matter, as is usually the case on Capitol Hill, was motivated by expediency and not heroic ideals."

In February 2004, Ethics Scoreboard praised Hatch for refusing to support a member of Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist's staff who without authorization reviewed e-mails to and from Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee, and who then leaked some details to the press.

At the time, Hatch, who was repeatedly quoted as saying "gentlemen do not read other gentlemen's mail," was criticized by conservatives "for turning on a devoted paladin of the Right who had exposed some genuinely shady tactics employed by the Judiciary Committee Democrats to block Bush conservative nominees for judgeships," Ethics Scoreboard reported.

Since that time, "discussions with those in a position to know have revealed that Senator Hatch's handling of this incident was in truth an example of a leader throwing a subordinate to the wolves in order to burnish his image. Hatch himself has a well-earned reputation as a prolific leaker of confidential and even classified information, and also had a role in creating the atmosphere of bitter ideological combat on the Judiciary Committee that led to the incident."

Story continues below
Ethics Scoreboard said there is also inconclusive evidence that Hatch encouraged the inaccurate perception that Manuel Miranda had actually "hacked" the e-mails, when in fact they were simply improperly stored so that others could gain access to them.

Miranda, the staffer who was subsequently fired over the incident known as "Memogate," has since gone on to be an oft-quoted conservative commentator on judiciary issues.

Ethics Scoreboard said Hatch was correct in his assertion that it is unethical to read other people's e-mails, and the revocation of the award because of Hatch's motivation was not intended to suggest that Miranda's actions were appropriate.

"And though the Scoreboard will not retract its assessment that reading the e-mails was wrong, it does regret the harshness of its rhetoric in the original piece," Ethics Scoreboard wrote. "Miranda behaved in a manner that reflects the toxic environment of ideological warfare in Congress these days, an ethically barren environment in which the Golden Rule seems as quaint and irrelevant as a Mother Goose rhyme."

And in the Memogate affair, the organization concluded, "Hatch was no hero."

Hatch's office had no comment on the report.


E-mail: spang@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

KSL: Prostitution in Utah County

If this is such a big problem, why have we not heard more about it? Sounds...

I'm a Y fan from LV but getting tired of this being their only post season...

As a creative writing major, I can say from experience that writing is not an...

BYU would like friendlier rivalry

The university administration needs to set the tone for the games. BYU has...

Letters: Rushing to judge Palin

Replace apocalyptic fear-based rhetoric with more restrained fear-based...

I am a DWTS fan, and an Osmond (collective noun) fan. Frankly, I was shocked...

Letters: Time for health reform?

Vote... | 1:02 p.m. Pretty soon it won't MATTER if you have a job. You're...

Wait. Did I read this correctly? They played a game in the large metropolis...

To, helping hands. I am so sorry for your loss. Mark was my friend. I hope...

'Maybe the reason you're being harassed is not because you're gay, but...

Advertisements