From Deseret News archives:

2nd recall targets Ute leader

Published: Monday, Nov. 14, 2005 9:49 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
FORT DUCHESNE, Uintah County — Uintah band members who want Ute Tribe chairwoman Maxine Natchees ousted presented the tribal business committee with a second recall petition last week.

Unlike the first recall petition against the veteran tribal leader, which was presented 18 months after signatures were originally collected, the signatures on this petition were gathered recently. The recall petition ordinance mandates that signatures must be collected and submitted within 60 days.

According to petition carriers, 145 names were collected. In order to trigger a recall election against Natchees, 123 of the 145 signatures must be declared valid by the tribe's Department of Vital Statistics. To be valid, the ordinance requires that a signature be that of a tribal member, age 21 or older, who lives within the original boundaries of the reservation and is affiliated with the Uintah Band.

The disputed tribal chairwoman has come under attack from her constituents for her loyalty to controversial tribal finance advisor John Jurrius. She is accused of failing to listen to her Uintah band members and disregarding the tribe's constitution. The latest recall effort has Natchees' supporters in other bands taking to the airwaves to urge anyone who signed the petition to go to the tribal court and have his or her name removed.

Story continues below
The radio ads claim that if Natchees is removed from the business committee, tribal elders and children will lose their monthly payment benefits. At different times during his employment with the tribe, Jurrius has threatened to leave if his supporters on the committee face the possibility of being removed from office. The ads connect the elders' and children's payments to Jurrius and his financial plan for the tribe. Curtis Cesspooch, a Uinta band member who signed the recall petition contends that message is false advertising. "They are really playing on that financial plan, and the financial plan isn't the issue," he said. "The issue is accountability and violations of the constitution. All we are doing is exercising our constitutional right to replace an elected representative who we feel no longer represents us."

Natchees' supporters maintain that those pushing for the recall election are trying to "overthrow tribal government."

Vital statistic clerks are expected to issue their decision on the validity of the petition's signatures next week.


E-mail: ubsnews@ubtanet.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

To: Hammy Sammy [We can see in the last ten months, how Obama runs...

Garland fire department, not garfield

Hmmm, thought this was supposed to be a Christian news publication. You'd...

A lot of stupid comments here.

I love that fact that in your 4:16 post you talk about the Constitution being...

Ex-legislators call for ethics reform

The ethics initiative has very little to do with ethics and a whole lot to do...

Letters: Trump card for believers

To Mike Richards: This is the fourteenth amendment to the constitution. It...

you would do if you see a loved one getting beat up? I doubt it you would...

Your letter states: "Those of us who understand the true meaning of...

Looks like Randy Rahe had great success with Coach Cravens' players! Now he...

Advertisements