From Deseret News archives:

Fallout victimization absolutely not exaggerated

Published: Monday, Nov. 14, 2005 8:00 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
In a newspaper that has a proud legacy of uncovering the hard truths of what fallout from nuclear testing did to unwitting Americans living downwind, Lee Benson's column, "Are Utah Fallout Stories Grossly Exaggerated," is particularly irresponsible. Benson lent credence to retired Dixie College chemistry instructor Daniel Miles' assertion that only five to 10 people were the victims of fallout, calling the tragic stories of downwinders "urban myths."

Of course, we would all like to believe that our government's reckless program of nuclear testing did not make us sick or lead to the deaths of friends, family and other loved ones. But the evidence suggests otherwise. In fact, for every source Miles cites that minimizes the health effects of testing, we can cite sources linking fallout exposure to health consequences.

Dr. Carl J. Johnson's 1984 article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, for instance, found a "startling increase" in cancer rates among residents living in an area of Utah downwind of the test site — higher rates of leukemia, lymphoma, melanoma, cancers of the breast, thyroid, colon, stomach and bone in a population that prior to testing lacked the environmental and lifestyle factors associated with cancer.

Story continues below
That fallout from hundreds of nuclear tests — a quarter of them more powerful than the bomb that destroyed Hiroshima — affected people across the country is well-established. Data show that downwinders exist not just in southern Utah, but in northern Utah, Idaho, Montana, Missouri and New York. In 1953, independent scientists from the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute documented dangerous levels of radiation blanketing their city in the wake of Shot Simon, a very dirty blast that rained out on upstate New York 2,300 miles from the test site. At the time, government meteorologists said they feared even higher levels were raining out on Missouri, where no one was recording them.

The National Cancer Institute in a major study released in 1997 concluded that every county in the continental United States got some level of fallout from nuclear testing and that as many as 212,000 cases of thyroid cancer alone may be linked to testing. That's only one radiation-related cancer. There are dozens of others, as well as radiation-related immune system and genetic disorders — some of which do not show up for decades after exposure. Factor these in and the number of illnesses is likely much higher than the NCI's 212,000 estimate.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

When Boozer was shooting the free throws, why Sloan didn't substitute Mathew...

Letters: Global warming a lie

actions, I will be forced to be accountable for them. I refuse. I am an...

What's with the Utah fans flashing the double L sign?

@mark: So Sam da Ham... you were just making it up?" I'm a climate...

Utes excited to go to San Diego

"I have no idea why BYU fans are talking smack about bowl opponents. Even if...

TCU versus BSU unpopular

You say to "quit whining and play somebody." Isn't that what everyone is...

BoM translation remarkably consistent

Reading these comments, I start wondering-- Whatever happened to faith? Why...

Utes excited to go to San Diego

All those numbers when all you reall need to know is that BYU has beat Utah...

BYU eager for crack at Oregon State

All thos numbers when all you reall need to know is that BYU has beat Utah...

So Sam da Ham, when you said this: "Not so. Al Gore is poised to make...

Advertisements