From Deseret News archives:

Y. professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC

Published: Thursday, Nov. 10, 2005 9:13 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The physics of 9/11 — including how fast and symmetrically one of the World Trade Center buildings fell — prove that official explanations of the collapses are wrong, says a Brigham Young University physics professor.

In fact, it's likely that there were "pre-positioned explosives" in all three buildings at ground zero, says Steven E. Jones.

In a paper posted online Tuesday and accepted for peer-reviewed publication next year, Jones adds his voice to those of previous skeptics, including the authors of the Web site www.wtc7.net, whose research Jones quotes. Jones' article can be found at www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html.

Jones, who conducts research in fusion and solar energy at BYU, is calling for an independent, international scientific investigation "guided not by politicized notions and constraints but rather by observations and calculations.

"It is quite plausible that explosives were pre-planted in all three buildings and set off after the two plane crashes — which were actually a diversion tactic," he writes. "Muslims are (probably) not to blame for bringing down the WTC buildings after all," Jones writes.

Story continues below
As for speculation about who might have planted the explosives, Jones said, "I don't usually go there. There's no point in doing that until we do the scientific investigation."

Previous investigations, including those of FEMA, the 9/11 Commission and NIST (the National Institutes of Standards and Technology), ignore the physics and chemistry of what happened on Sept. 11, 2001, to the Twin Towers and the 47-story building known as WTC 7, he says. The official explanation — that fires caused structural damage that caused the buildings to collapse — can't be backed up by either testing or history, he says.

Jones acknowledges that there have been "junk science" conspiracy theories about what happened on 9/11, but "the explosive demolition hypothesis better satisfies tests of repeatability and parsimony and therefore is not 'junk science.' "

In a 9,000-word article that Jones says will be published in the book "The Hidden History of 9/11," by Elsevier, Jones offers these arguments:

Recent comments

one question..just weighing the odds...something i do not want to...

kelly | Oct. 19, 2009 at 1:08 a.m.

No doubt the government is hiding the truth. If Muslim terrorists...

LickDaCat | Sept. 17, 2009 at 11:58 a.m.

I am disgusted with our government and of our society for being...

Miguel A Tinoco Rodriguez | Aug. 16, 2009 at 3:27 p.m.

Image

"It is quite plausible that explosives were pre-planted in all three (WTC) buildings," BYU physics professor Steven E. Jones says.

previousnext

Latest comments

Love ya, Tom. You are so right.

TCU creams U.

First - thanks for all the kind words of support and good wishes from many of...

And Gordon Monson is such a UTE cheerleader. Goes both ways.

TCU stays 4th in AP; Y. 19th, U. 23rd

Movement in the polls is based on MANY things: How you did this week ...

Frank, the government does not own the financial services sector. But it...

Bennett at center of GOP storm

I will not vote for Bennett. His decision to support the so-called...

Wow!!! BYU wins and the Utes get creamed. You'd think it's the other way...

Letters: Science prostituted

You do not "know" that, you believe that. Huge difference between knowing...

The GOP has gone mad, which is why it is consigning itself to minority status...

My daughter and I were on Redwood Road near 9000 South when we were able to...

Advertisements
Advertisement