From Deseret News archives:

Computerized voting is a solid winner

Published: Tuesday, Nov. 8, 2005 7:11 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
FARMINGTON — By all accounts, the voting was unanimous. It was as if the old Soviet regime materialized Tuesday at the polling station at Farmington Junior High. There hadn't been this much Election Day solidarity since the 1984 mayoral election of Leningrad.

Everyone agreed. The new computerized voting machines are an unqualified success.

"This is the way to go — the only way to go," said Mildred Olson as she exited the school library after exercising her right as an American on one of the city's new $3,600 high-tech, touch-screen voting machines. "I really don't think you can make a mistake . . ."

She paused just long enough for effect

". . . other than maybe about who you voted for."

Mildred, it should be pointed out, is 89 years old. Until this year, she'd voted all her life in the conventional way on a tangible piece of paper.

But "going computer" was as easy for her as changing hats.

"It really was not hard," she said. "All I had to do was read."

And technically, you don't even have to do that. For the sight impaired, the new machines are equipped with headphones that enable voting without seeing.

And if you try to vote twice, forget about it. One punch card, one vote, no exceptions.


Story continues below
Touch-screen voting takes no time at all. I watched as one woman, Amy Calvin, 35, completed her ballot and was out the door in one minute and 17 seconds. The performance was all the more impressive because, A) She had no idea she was being timed, and B) She was holding her baby, Samuel, in one hand, voting with the other, and keeping her two other children, Nicole and Aaron, from ransacking the library.

For younger voters like Amy, the new machines are second nature, about as intimidating as PlayStation. "I really can't remember life without computers," Amy said. "But I do remember when my parents didn't have computers."

Others, such as Nelda Oakeson, needed a little reassurance from the friendly polling station staff of Kay Percival, Floyd Breeze, Sue Smith and Janice Rose. "Anything that says computers or technology, I lose my mind," said Nelda as she waited for her husband, Willard, to finish his voting. "But once they showed me where to put my (access) card, it was OK."

"I had one tiny problem," said Willard. "Until I realized I had to push one more button, the one that said 'cast ballot.' "

The Oakesons, both 74, have voted since Eisenhower was running and wouldn't go back — at least not as far as voting machines are concerned.

"This was quick and efficient," said Willard. "We were amazed."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Beck, Hannity, and Limbaugh get the audience they deserve and vice versa. ...

I find the rule,very discriminitory. I am not gay, I don't understand what...

Celtics crush Jazz

I understand we were outmanned last night. However, this effort was awful....

Tavernari has matured

My advice to Jonathan is shoot it when they pass it to you as soon as you...

Maybe they should try drafting a shooting guard who can shoot from outside ....

The sad thing about it is that there are actually people out there that are...

12 Utes return to Texas

Thank you TCU and BYU. Your wanting to beat Utah so bad has to drive you...

Celtics crush Jazz

Play fes and koufos. Look to the future. It looks like we will have two...

Letters: Obama 'too busy'

Oh come on. Obama's a horrible president, but I couldn't care less which...

"We had the best soccer of any place in the state. There's no disputing...

Advertisements
Advertisement