From Deseret News archives:

Fight looms over court choice

Conservatives hail, Democrats assail nomination of Alisto to Supreme Court

Published: Monday, Oct. 31, 2005 11:38 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — President Bush on Monday nominated a federal appeals court judge with unquestioned conservative credentials to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court, satisfying his supporters on the political right but inviting a knockdown battle with Democrats.

Bush's choice, Samuel A. Alito Jr., is a 15-year veteran of the Philadelphia-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, where he has participated in 3,500 cases and written about 300 opinions. He was named to that job by Bush's father.

Bush moved quickly to replace a failed nomination, that of White House counsel Harriet Miers, who withdrew as a Supreme Court pick on Thursday after she ran into harsh opposition from conservatives. Announcing his decision at the White House with Alito by his side, the president called Alito "one of the most accomplished and respected judges in America."

If confirmed by the Senate, the 55-year-old Alito would replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who has been a centrist and the swing vote in many closely decided cases.

Conservatives welcomed the choice. "President Bush has hit a home run," said Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss.

But liberal interest groups and some Democrats voiced immediate concerns, particularly because the choice may prove pivotal on the high court's future decisions on issues from abortion to civil rights and civil liberties.

Story continues below
"I would have hoped the president would have filled Sandra Day O'Connor's seat with a person in line with her philosophy," said Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La. "This is a needlessly provocative nomination," said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the senior Democrat on the Judiciary Committee.

Landrieu and 13 other senators from both parties joined in a truce earlier this year to head off a threatened filibuster over Bush's court nominations. They declared that they would not support such roadblock tactics unless "extraordinary circumstances" required it. For those who agreed to the deal, the question now is whether the Alito nomination meets that test.

A Republican member of the so-called "Gang of 14," Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, signaled that he would not support a filibuster. If Democrats try, it "will create a Middle East style of politics in the Senate," he said. But, asked about the possibility of a filibuster, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said: "I wouldn't take it off the table."

Bush seemed to acknowledge the delicacy of the situation when he introduced his nominee. He said Alito "has a deep understanding of the proper role of judges in our society. He understands that judges are to interpret the laws, not to impose their preferences or priorities."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Ron Edmonds, Associated Press

President Bush looks on as Samuel Alito speaks Monday after being nominated to the Supreme Court.

previousnext

Latest comments

U's all conference lb missed a tackle that cost U the game. I bet he has...

Considering that Corroon has not held statewide office and hasn't decided to...

Get over it! It is amazing how much media this has recieved--yet hardly...

Let it go already! One has to wonder why Ute fans are so sensitive and...

We have only one gay Senator, the closeted Sen Chris Buttars-R

Having been a member for over 40 years, this version of translation...

Two more running for 2nd District

GOP and independent conservatives have run against Matheson since he started...

U. eyes bowl for redemption

How many football games did U win saturday> Two less than the number of...

"Arpaio told the panel that his office is an "equal opportunity law...

Chaffetz: Leave Afghanistan

I spent 9 months in the US Army near the Pakistan border dodging bullets and...

Advertisements