From Deseret News archives:

Chamber pushes Legacy talks

Resolution favors negotiations to end litigation against parkway

Published: Thursday, Oct. 20, 2005 10:12 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Salt Lake Chamber on Monday released a resolution in support of negotiations to end litigation against the Legacy Parkway.

But the resolution, approved last week, includes several strongly worded statements. Notable are two paragraphs that say a proposed ban on commercial truck traffic on the highway is detrimental to economic development.

The resolution states: "The agreement-in-principle includes some restrictions and provisions that the Chamber deems detrimental to economic development, growth and commerce, including a prohibition of trucks using the Legacy Parkway. . ."

Chamber president Lane Beattie emphasized, however, that despite the truck ban included in a draft settlement, the Chamber still supports negotiations that will lead to construction of the Legacy Parkway.

"We strongly encourage the Legislature to adopt the final agreement," he said. "That is being said even in light of the fact that we know the ban on trucks is an issue. Trucks are a very important part of this entire negotiated agreement, but it is from a business standpoint that we encourage them to get under construction and under way as soon as possible."

Story continues below
The Chamber has released previous statements in support of Legacy. The road, along with other state transportation systems, is critical to economic development, according to Beattie.

Scott Hymas, CEO of RC Willey and a Chamber member, said: "I agree with supporting a negotiated agreement. The litigation has gone on long enough. We don't have a final agreement or actual definition of 'truck traffic,' but I think for all parties involved, we believe in a negotiated settlement."

On Sept. 21, the governor's office signed what is known as an agreement-in-principle with plaintiffs in the 2001 suit against Legacy. Key aspects of the draft agreement include the following: a prohibition on truck traffic; a speed limit set at 55 mph; no billboards; noise-reducing pavement; and a pledge of $2.5 million for an environmental study of mass transit.

In early November, lawmakers plan to meet in a special session to vote for or against a formal settlement agreement. Whether they have enough votes to pass the agreement is still up for debate; several groups have announced they do not support the agreement because it includes a ban on trucks.


E-mail: nwarburton@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Beck, Hannity, and Limbaugh get the audience they deserve and vice versa. ...

I find the rule,very discriminitory. I am not gay, I don't understand what...

Celtics crush Jazz

I understand we were outmanned last night. However, this effort was awful....

Tavernari has matured

My advice to Jonathan is shoot it when they pass it to you as soon as you...

Maybe they should try drafting a shooting guard who can shoot from outside ....

The sad thing about it is that there are actually people out there that are...

12 Utes return to Texas

Thank you TCU and BYU. Your wanting to beat Utah so bad has to drive you...

Celtics crush Jazz

Play fes and koufos. Look to the future. It looks like we will have two...

Letters: Obama 'too busy'

Oh come on. Obama's a horrible president, but I couldn't care less which...

"We had the best soccer of any place in the state. There's no disputing...

Advertisements
Advertisement