From Deseret News archives:

Chamber pushes Legacy talks

Resolution favors negotiations to end litigation against parkway

Published: Thursday, Oct. 20, 2005 10:12 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Salt Lake Chamber on Monday released a resolution in support of negotiations to end litigation against the Legacy Parkway.

But the resolution, approved last week, includes several strongly worded statements. Notable are two paragraphs that say a proposed ban on commercial truck traffic on the highway is detrimental to economic development.

The resolution states: "The agreement-in-principle includes some restrictions and provisions that the Chamber deems detrimental to economic development, growth and commerce, including a prohibition of trucks using the Legacy Parkway. . ."

Chamber president Lane Beattie emphasized, however, that despite the truck ban included in a draft settlement, the Chamber still supports negotiations that will lead to construction of the Legacy Parkway.

"We strongly encourage the Legislature to adopt the final agreement," he said. "That is being said even in light of the fact that we know the ban on trucks is an issue. Trucks are a very important part of this entire negotiated agreement, but it is from a business standpoint that we encourage them to get under construction and under way as soon as possible."

Story continues below
The Chamber has released previous statements in support of Legacy. The road, along with other state transportation systems, is critical to economic development, according to Beattie.

Scott Hymas, CEO of RC Willey and a Chamber member, said: "I agree with supporting a negotiated agreement. The litigation has gone on long enough. We don't have a final agreement or actual definition of 'truck traffic,' but I think for all parties involved, we believe in a negotiated settlement."

On Sept. 21, the governor's office signed what is known as an agreement-in-principle with plaintiffs in the 2001 suit against Legacy. Key aspects of the draft agreement include the following: a prohibition on truck traffic; a speed limit set at 55 mph; no billboards; noise-reducing pavement; and a pledge of $2.5 million for an environmental study of mass transit.

In early November, lawmakers plan to meet in a special session to vote for or against a formal settlement agreement. Whether they have enough votes to pass the agreement is still up for debate; several groups have announced they do not support the agreement because it includes a ban on trucks.


E-mail: nwarburton@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Reading the letter, I am not sure that it is eating that is the sin, but...

The media that Sarah criticizes so much is the same force that is providing...

3A: Juan Diego's last-gasp play

We'll be back next year. I know it, and I hope that all of our coaches and...

Utah Utes whip SDSU

This year TCU has proven to the world how weak the MWC is (MWC=WAC). BYU and...

Secularists and religious arguments

I have no problem with religious people voting their conscience. I do,...

I have to agree that the comment about "the pesky seniors" is uncalled...

I was in my Latin class in High School in California. Our teacher hadn't...

Glenn Beck is Oprah's heir apparent since he has a larger following and can...

Atheist groups flourish on campuses

of atheism just as morally equal to spreading the Gospel of Christianity. To...

Yes, 40% of doctors polled said they will definitely or seriously consider...

Advertisements