From Deseret News archives:

More delay for Legacy?

Conflicts on the Hill could dismantle agreement

Published: Friday, Oct. 21, 2005 9:12 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Disagreements between lawmakers may dismantle a framework settlement agreement involving the Legacy Parkway.

House and Senate Republicans and Democrats met Wednesday in caucus to discuss conflicts over the 14-mile roadway from Farmington to North Salt Lake. Talks centered on two issues: a proposed truck ban on the road and an agreement that "no billboards" would be along the route.

While lawmakers are arguing over the definition of a "truck," it turns out that the "no billboard" agreement is not so clearly-defined, either.

The Utah Department of Transportation can ban billboards from its property, but it can't ban the signs from private property that adjoins Legacy, already a designated scenic byway.

City ordinances will determine whether billboards can be erected along Legacy's east side. "It's almost impossible to regulate the signage there because they don't own the ground," said Rep. Stuart Adams, R-Layton.

But Democrats say the revelation that billboards may be allowed is a betrayal of an agreement signed last month.

"We were always told 'no billboards,' " said House Minority Leader Ralph Becker, D-Salt Lake.

Story continues below
And considering the political clout of Bill Reagan and his Reagan Outdoor Advertising — which routinely donates money and/or free billboards to key city, county and legislative candidates' re-election races — "there may or may not be billboards on Legacy," Becker said.

Reagan's company donated $20,000 to Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr.'s 2004 campaign. Reagan met with Gov. Huntsman on Monday about billboards on Legacy.

"We have not requested any changes based on that meeting," said Mike Mower, the governor's legislative liaison. "UDOT is taking the lead for the administration in negotiating the agreement with legislators and plaintiffs."

Said UDOT spokesman Tom Hudachko: "As far as anything that is being discussed right now, that is part of the negotiating process and until a final agreement is reached I don't want to comment on the details."

He did say, however, that the agreement signed last month about Legacy was just a "skeleton" agreement and that the final settlement agreement would include specific details.

Lawmakers are on a tight time frame to approve details of the final agreement. A special session is tentatively scheduled for Nov. 9. With disagreements occurring so close to that deadline, lawmakers are concerned they won't have enough votes to approve the agreement.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

5A: Bingham rolls to title game

Nice try but anybody who has watched Alta know it's the 2007 team that was...

Enjoy your win and stop trying to take down other teams. It only makes aggies...

TCU stuck at fourth in BCS

In looking through most of these comments on Des News and I have not seen...

TCU stuck at fourth in BCS

Utes losing to TCU isn't the end of the world! If they lose to BYU, it will be!

Most important thing, on finding a good contractor..Make sure he has a...

Wounded Utes limp home

Hey Utes, it's not fun talking about your showing in Texas. Bad mouth the...

Why not restore the higher tax brackets for the wealthy. Since most of them...

Age isn't defined by a number, it is an attitude. You are only as old as you...

Relieved Cougs prep for Falcons

Air Force is a solid team. Last year, we beat them at AF when we had a worse...

Dobbs and Beck are actors who give their devotees a mess of lies, opinions,...

Advertisements
Advertisement