From Deseret News archives:

Activists ratchet up fight over Kane roads

Environmentalists' lawsuit says county reopened trails

Published: Thursday, Oct. 13, 2005 9:42 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Environmentalists have thrown another log on the long-burning conflagration over off-road vehicle trails in Kane County.

In a federal lawsuit, they claim Kane County is trying to usurp federal authority by opening routes that were legally closed to ORV traffic in Bryce Canyon and Zion national parks, Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area and wilderness study areas on Bureau of Land Management property.

A Kane County commissioner responded that the southern Utah county is only trying to regulate ORV use. If the federal government closed a traditional right-of-way, he added, that was done illegally.

The suit was announced Thursday in a conference call by Earthjustice, The Wilderness Society and the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance. Earthjustice, a law firm focusing on environmental causes, which has offices in Denver and elsewhere.

Plaintiffs are The Wilderness Society, based in Washington, D.C., and SUWA, Salt Lake City. Defendants are Kane County and its commissioners.

Story continues below
"This case has arisen because Kane County and county officials . . . have flouted the United States Constitution and the management authority of the U.S. Department of Interior by opening up these fragile federal lands to destructive off-road vehicle (ORV) use," states the suit, a copy of which was provided by The Wilderness Society.

It asserts that Kane County passed ordinances opening roads that were closed to ORVs by the federal government, posted its own road signs and ripped down federal signs saying areas were closed.

The federal court in Salt Lake City confirmed the suit was filed.

Kristen Brengel of The Wilderness Society said that in the summer of 2003, Kane County officials removed signs in the national monument that prohibited ORV use. The BLM, which manages the national monument, "initiated a criminal investigation" but no legal action has been taken, she said.

Later, the county put up signs saying certain areas were open in the monument — areas that had been closed to ORV use by the federal government, she said. In August, Kane County passed an ordinance governing ORV use on federal land, including parks, the monument and wilderness study areas, she added.

The suit is intended "to prevent this damage from occurring in these areas," Brengel added.

"The county is attempting to seize control of the management" of some of America's most spectacular natural lands, said Ted Zukoski, lawyer for Earthjustice. Under the Constitution's Supremacy Clause, he added, "federal law is supreme where it operates."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

As a BYU fan after seeing Tim Tebow react after he did playing in the Bama...

Letters: Preening president

mark | 11:17 p.m Obama never said that. Obama did say he would take advice...

BCS crazy, you don't know what you are talking about. Go hawks!!!

I don't know Mr. Valdez, but I do know a couple members of his family. If I...

Utahns want health care reform bills

I want one thing explained to me before I will consider any of your...

Letters: Report the news

"The U.K. Met Office says it will release weather data next week for the...

Sheepman fighting to save flock

Have any of you (2009, stop grazing, perfect solution,perfect mess,...

Why hasn't BYU practiced this week? Well ... it might be so some players...

Letters: Report the news

I guess fair and balanced reporting by conservative shills as omitted that...

Zadruga Guy: Anyone who cites wikipedia clearly would be unable to understand...

Advertisements