From Deseret News archives:

Companies may face exodus soon as boomers retire

40% of U.S. labor force will reach traditional retirement ages by the end of this decade

Published: Friday, Oct. 7, 2005 12:39 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
And to corporate cost cutters, the thinning ranks might not seem like such a bad thing, especially in industries such as manufacturing where jobs continue to move overseas.

"A lot of companies do welcome the chance to have older workers leave, especially those with seniority-based pay systems, because they can be replaced with cheaper workers," says Peter Cappelli, a management professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School.

Still, retirements don't necessarily substitute well for layoffs, Ashworth says.

"You're no longer targeting who you're losing, and you're losing your most experienced people."

Some experts think the impact won't be as stark as the numbers suggest. Fully 70 percent to 80 percent of baby boomers expect to continue working in later life, several studies show. And amendments to the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act outlawed age-based mandatory retirement in most industries in the 1970s. The upshot: most boomers can work as long as they like, barring layoffs. "Right now I have no plans to stop," says Leola Williams, a 73-year-old housekeeping manager at Baptist Health South Florida Inc. in Miami.

Story continues below
Still, many companies simply don't know how many of their workers plan to retire, and when — in part because they fear that asking will open the door to age-discrimination claims, says Jeri Sedlar, co-author of the Conference Board's report. There are no federal rules against asking employees retirement-related questions. But the formal collection of such information could be used as fodder in a lawsuit if a company later laid off, fired, demoted or failed to promote the workers who had been surveyed.

Some companies have sidestepped these concerns by querying workers anonymously or asking employees of all ages about their plans five years from now, says Linda Barrington, research director at the Conference Board.

In fact, when the Platte River utility decided to poll its employees about their exit strategies, "we reassured them ahead of time that we were not planning their retirement parties," says Green, the human-resource manager.

Some companies that are concerned about a wave of retirements are getting creative, including offering programs that let employees technically retire, yet stay connected to their employers.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Bishop Burton: These are good times

The times that man is so self absorbed that they forget to serve others, give...

Religion in politics is tiresome

A very rational and intelligent evaluation of a growing problem in our...

“And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye,...

I thought that Obama said he would pull the troops out when he was running...

I like to earn some credit, I was hoping they were going to draft him in the...

MARIO YOU GOT THAT RIGHT JASMINE IS THE BEST AND CAN'T ANYONE TAKE THAT AWAY...

Did Eagar imply Palin endorsement?

She also paid Joe the Plumber to come to Utah and stump for her. I guess she...

Stockton and Malone lived in a different time. These days doctors run tests...

You are exactly right about Harpring. He is a tough, dedicated warrior,...

MWC '09 season in review

Dick, I can't agree because the dredges are still awful without the ability...

Advertisements