From Deseret News archives:

Candidate questionnaire — Matt Dalton

Published: Wednesday, Sept. 28, 2005 11:11 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Question 1: Mayor Rocky Anderson has said the city needs to increase it's police force by 90 officers by 2010. In order to do that he will need the City Council to allocate the funding needed for these new officers. Adding that many more officers will be wildly expensive for the city and may require tax increases. As a council member will you support adding so many more officers to the force? Would you support tax increases for more police officers?

Answer: The cost of crime is more expensive than the cost of crime prevention. Our police force has remained at about 450 officers for approximately 30 years. Our hard working officers are overburdened. I feel that it is important to not only to look seriously at increasing the size of our police force but also to adequately compensate our current officers in the field. I believe that an investment in our police force would pay dividends to the residents of Salt Lake City in the long term. The safety of our families, homes and neighbors are concerns we all share. I plan on working with city public safety officers and community councils to help maintain a high level of neighborhood safety. In addition, I am also in favor of programs such as the Community Emergency Response Team (CERT), Neighborhood Watch and Community Action Teams.

Question 2: Downtown remains a concern for many residents. Do you feel the city is doing the right things to help revitalize downtown? What would you do as a council member to help downtown?

Story continues below
Answer: I feel that the investment in the downtown malls planned by the LDS church will significantly help with the revitalization of the downtown areas. I would work to encourage increased high density urban housing in our downtown.

Question 3: One big issue that could soon become an issue in District 7 has been people tearing down traditional homes and replacing them with monster homes. Some say new, bigger homes are needed to attract families to the city and maintain property values. Others feel these large homes are ugly and aren't compatible with the city's traditional neighborhoods. What's your opinion? How should city government handle this issue?

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

A locked gate that a five year old can open is not secure enough for a dog...

"Tang's owner"? What's the individual's name? And how can a little boy...

What For ?

Obama vows strong role in Asia

At first I thought this was going to deal with caring about the american...

Womens BB - LOSERS (yes) mens BB - LOSERS (yes)..... and going for the...

"ick" I hope not!

Aggies edge Weber State

Sounds like a good game to watch. It was suppose to be on B2 TV but were not...

Well, this means that until the end of January, there will be little if any...

I laughed and laughed at this news. All four of my sisters live in the...

The sound of the train brakes as it pegs the odd car or pedestrian won't be a...

Advertisements
Advertisement