From Deseret News archives:

Utah isn't a nuke dump

Published: Sunday, Sept. 18, 2005 7:08 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Contrary to a recent New York Times editorial, which chides Utah leaders for using every tool at their disposal to block a private storage facility for spent nuclear rods in the western desert, we say, take any and all necessary means to keep the stuff out.

It's difficult to comprehend — in the post-Sept. 11 world—why anyone would conclude that shipping spent nuclear fuel cross-country is a good idea. Worse yet is the proposed Private Fuel Storage facility in Tooele County, where casks of the nuclear material would be stored above ground. The airspace above the proposed facility is frequented by jet fighters from Hill Air Force Base that train over the nearby Utah Test and Training Range.

But what is most unsettling is the "temporary" nature of the disposal site. "Temporary" means at least 40 years. If and when the nation's only designated permanent disposal repository goes on line at Yucca Mountain in Nevada, 40 years worth of additional waste will have been generated and require disposal. Will there be space available at Yucca to relocate waste from the PFS site? Yucca Mountain, an underground facility, will have finite storage capacity. If the U.S. energy policy increases the demand for nuclear power, the supply of spent fuel rods will grow exponentially.

Story continues below
Although much is made of nearly a decade of review that has gone into the PFS proposal, Utah can ill-afford to become Yucca Mountain by default.

Instead, the Bush administration needs to permit the reprocessing of spent fuel rods where they were produced rather than risk shipment of this material to a single site.

Presently, the Department of Homeland Security is reviewing the safety aspects of the PFS site, which would be located on the Goshute Indian Reservation in Skull Valley, about 50 miles from Salt Lake City. Other avenues of redress include asking the Bureau of Land Management to block the placement of a rail spur on public lands to transport the materials to the PFS site. A proposal to designate the area as wilderness also is before the Senate.

To Easterners who naively — or arrogantly — consider the entire West a vast wasteland, there seems little harm in placing high-level nuclear waste in Utah's western desert. People who have lived in the West for generations, however, see things differently. They have legitimate concerns about becoming the nation's nuke waste dump. Despite any assurances government agencies might provide, Utah's history with above-ground nuclear tests and weapons testing at Dugway provide ample reason for skepticism. This history should add energy to the fight.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

RE:silent majority "im a strong member of the church. i would like to...

The Ethics in Legislation will have a 2 edged sword. Any 3 individuals can...

This article and the points many of the commentators bring up are very...

Real Champions

I'm not a soccer fan, but I'm not totally unfamiliar with the sport. But the...

Wynn will blow past BYU. I recommend Utah fans to stay at either...

Boys basketball rankings

I had to go back and check. I thought Manti was ranked in 3A.

Way to go Real! We are so excited to have a championship in our state. The...

Reagan much-beloved in Utah

Ronald Reagan was a good man, and I was proud to know him. The first time I...

Letters: Palin on the fringe?

Okay Charles, here's one, just off the top of my head. Gov. Palin stated that...

Bronco, Kyle rubber match

I can't believe how much ignorance is spewed from both sides. Can we please...

Advertisements