From Deseret News archives:

Navajos fight against uranium mining

Apparent losing battle resembles Utah's N-storage oppositionBattle resembles Utah's opposition to N-storage

Published: Thursday, Sept. 15, 2005 11:27 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Navajos are still living with the deadly legacy of uranium mining from 1948 to 1971 when thousands worked in the mines and mills. They are eligible for compensation under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, originally sponsored by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah.

Hatch spokesman Adam Elggren said the senator has worked to get RECA coverage for "as many deserving claimants as possible," but a problem with documentation seems to be more an administrative issue than a legislative one.

"We will certainly keep an eye on it," Elggren said.

The problem is many of the afflicted Navajos are traditionalists who do not have documents — things like birth and marriage certificates — required by the current legislation.

Shirley was hosted at a Thursday afternoon congressional briefing by Reps. Jim Matheson, D-Utah; Tom Udall, D-N.M., and Rick Renzi, R-Ariz. Shirley said he has found sympathetic ears everywhere he has turned in Washington.

"I went to sleep last night with a glad heart," he said.

But sympathy won't stop the mines. And like the state of Utah, the Navajo Nation will probably have to make its arguments in federal court, Shirley said.

Getting Congress to change RECA may be a lot easier than getting the NRC to change its mind. Shirley said the NRC has ignored the tribal government's laws and its scientific evidence.

Story continues below
"The NRC is not even looking at the scientific data we submitted as a nation," he said, "but the data submitted by mineral companies, well, (the NRC) listens to them. I would not be surprised if there is something in the works behind the scenes."

The NRC disputed Shirley's allegations, saying it "looks at all information provided to us during licensing reviews, including information from opponents of a proposed facility," according to NRC spokesman David McIntyre.

The Navajo Nation has made the argument — unsuccessfully, so far — that the mining proposal strikes at the heart of tribal sovereignty, threatens public health and could contaminate the regional aquifer that provides drinking water for 20,000 people.

The mining proposal is not the first time the Navajos have turned down economic development for environmental reasons.

Shirley said the same nuclear power utilities who now plan to send their waste to Goshute lands once approached the Navajo Nation about storing nuclear waste in a remote county there. The Navajos said no, and that position has never wavered.

"The Earth is sacred, and we will not introduce anything into it that is foreign," he said. "We will continue to say no."


E-mail: spang@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Russia rules v. Jehovah's Witnesses

Russian citizens have freedom of religion - they are free to belong to any...

Downtown plans three-day 'Eve'

YES!

Redshirt, can you tell me exactly what data has been manipulated and what...

I knew her only in passing but what I know of her is admirable. I truly hope...

They had to split it up for the rest of the schools in the MWC (twice now)....

Police seek missing WVC woman

Susan I am concerned and hoping for your safe return. Please be safe, and...

Store planning for Palin crush

so if an autobiography is written by someone other then who the book is about...

then all the killer toxins utah gives off to the other states like high...

To "Not Educated | 4:48 p.m." nice hack and misrepresentation. My original...

I hope this study didn't cost much! It's just common sense that this is the...

Advertisements