From Deseret News archives:

U.S. needs amendment to protect flag

Published: Monday, Sept. 5, 2005 9:13 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
I am proud of the fact that my office recently defended Utah's flag-abuse statute before the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.

As a United States Naval officer, I thrilled at the opportunity every time I stepped aboard a warship, faced the stern, squared my shoulders and saluted the flag of the United States of America. My salute was not to a beautiful piece of cloth but to our nation and to the liberties and the ultimate sacrifices that the flag represents. It brought me great comfort and pride to know that wherever that ship sailed, the flag declared, and guaranteed, its sovereignty.

As the chief law enforcement officer of Utah, I swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States and to protect the rights of her citizens. It is with that authority that I declare my full support of Sen. Orrin Hatch's bipartisan flag amendment.

The framers of our Constitution understood that the flag was in a very real sense a protective seal declaring the existence and sovereignty of our nation. They understood that laws to protect and preserve this unique symbol did not interfere with First Amendment rights. For most of our history, this commitment to the flag, one distinguished from any particular ideology or viewpoint, was accepted and supported by our courts.

Story continues below
In 1634, a colonial trial court concluded that defacing the flag was considered an act of rebellion and tantamount to an invasion, even when done at home, in peacetime and for reasons of peaceful protest. James Madison, "Father" of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, condemned the defacement of the flag of any nation as an attack upon that nation's sovereignty and a violation of the law.

Likewise, Thomas Jefferson recognized the sovereignty interest in the flag and said the First Amendment did not prohibit "systematic and severe" punishment for those who violated the flag. Both Jefferson and Madison believed that protecting the flag did not suppress expression but protected the incidents of sovereignty, including commerce, citizenship and neutrality rights.

In 1907 the Supreme Court confirmed "from the earliest periods in the history of the human race, banners, standards and ensigns have been adopted. It is not then remarkable that the American people . . . early in their history, prescribed a flag as symbolical of the existence and sovereignty of the Nation."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

I hope someone can identify that punk. It is a shame that whack jobs like...

Hall reprimanded by MWC

........soon. Utah (and Boise St.) will leave for the Pac-10.

Sociopaths do not have a conscience, so I doubt they care what the difference...

Yes, there are so many shopping choices in Burley, ID. You will end up in...

Utes won't respond to Hall

Maybe the Whittinghams and Kyle have no response because they are exercising...

Letters: Taxing rich doesn't help

Any country who pays teachers $42,000 per year, but a corporate exec $12...

Legalization of pot is harmful

The last three Presidents have smoked pot. It obviously did not destroy their...

Mitchell called intelligent, controlling

It's only been 5 years, whats the hurry? The state has plenty of money for...

Cougs begin bowl preparations

You still have women's gymnastics. Scoreboard: BYU 26 - Utah 23

Utes won't respond to Hall

You sir are an idiot...I would love see any evidence of Mrs. Max Hall or his...

Advertisements