From Deseret News archives:
U.S. needs amendment to protect flag
As a United States Naval officer, I thrilled at the opportunity every time I stepped aboard a warship, faced the stern, squared my shoulders and saluted the flag of the United States of America. My salute was not to a beautiful piece of cloth but to our nation and to the liberties and the ultimate sacrifices that the flag represents. It brought me great comfort and pride to know that wherever that ship sailed, the flag declared, and guaranteed, its sovereignty.
As the chief law enforcement officer of Utah, I swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States and to protect the rights of her citizens. It is with that authority that I declare my full support of Sen. Orrin Hatch's bipartisan flag amendment.
The framers of our Constitution understood that the flag was in a very real sense a protective seal declaring the existence and sovereignty of our nation. They understood that laws to protect and preserve this unique symbol did not interfere with First Amendment rights. For most of our history, this commitment to the flag, one distinguished from any particular ideology or viewpoint, was accepted and supported by our courts.
Likewise, Thomas Jefferson recognized the sovereignty interest in the flag and said the First Amendment did not prohibit "systematic and severe" punishment for those who violated the flag. Both Jefferson and Madison believed that protecting the flag did not suppress expression but protected the incidents of sovereignty, including commerce, citizenship and neutrality rights.
In 1907 the Supreme Court confirmed "from the earliest periods in the history of the human race, banners, standards and ensigns have been adopted. It is not then remarkable that the American people . . . early in their history, prescribed a flag as symbolical of the existence and sovereignty of the Nation."
Comments
- Small ball: Holmstead lighting it up 9:30 p.m.
- Photo: Fun in snow 9:30 p.m.
- Campaign to help finances of elderly 9:27 p.m.
- Jazz Extra: Coming attractions 9:27 p.m.
- Just can't wait to wait in long lines 9:24 p.m.
- Swap site for strapped shoppers 9:24 p.m.
- Tips for holiday value hunters 9:23 p.m.
- Utes won't respond to Hall 9:17 p.m.
- Jazz notes: Injuries mounting 9:10 p.m.
- Society celebrates 350 years 9:10 p.m.
- Hall mouths off about hate of Utah
- BYU is champion of the state
- Cougars beat Utes in overtime
- Credit Coug defense for win
- Field goals, penalties doomed Utes
- Cougar defense rose to occasion
- Marriage definitions vary widely
- Banged up Jazz get best of Blazers
- Jones' joy for life remembered
- Fantasy is reality for BYU professor
- Hall mouths off about hate of Utah
847 - Cougars beat Utes in overtime
471 - BYU is champion of the state
136 - Thunder rolls by Jazz
136 - Man trapped in Nutty Putty cave dies
117 - Cave to be sealed with body inside
116 - Editorial: Poor welcome for Palin
113 - Rivalry Week is highly profane
90 - Hall's legacy measured today
79 - Y. focused on 10-win season
74
Ute fans hated Max Hall long before he returned the favor Saturday night. My...
This whole thing is so laughable. It's hilarious to me how much press this...
Nice institution of higher learning. Not. Please Max, go to class.
I still agree with Max Hall's first comments. Too bad he apologized.
I have always been a Utah, BYU and MWC/former WAC fan (I am a Utah grad and...
Get real. They couldn't get to their car because Utes fans were assaulting...
"...Last year at RES my family was spit on, had beer dumped on them, and were...
This is why few people read your column.
I am happy to see an actual apology (and clarification) rather than the...
I am disapointed that so many have excused or worse condoned the hateful...


You can be the first to comment on this story.