From Deseret News archives:

U.S. needs amendment to protect flag

Published: Monday, Sept. 5, 2005 9:13 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
I am proud of the fact that my office recently defended Utah's flag-abuse statute before the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.

As a United States Naval officer, I thrilled at the opportunity every time I stepped aboard a warship, faced the stern, squared my shoulders and saluted the flag of the United States of America. My salute was not to a beautiful piece of cloth but to our nation and to the liberties and the ultimate sacrifices that the flag represents. It brought me great comfort and pride to know that wherever that ship sailed, the flag declared, and guaranteed, its sovereignty.

As the chief law enforcement officer of Utah, I swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States and to protect the rights of her citizens. It is with that authority that I declare my full support of Sen. Orrin Hatch's bipartisan flag amendment.

The framers of our Constitution understood that the flag was in a very real sense a protective seal declaring the existence and sovereignty of our nation. They understood that laws to protect and preserve this unique symbol did not interfere with First Amendment rights. For most of our history, this commitment to the flag, one distinguished from any particular ideology or viewpoint, was accepted and supported by our courts.

Story continues below
In 1634, a colonial trial court concluded that defacing the flag was considered an act of rebellion and tantamount to an invasion, even when done at home, in peacetime and for reasons of peaceful protest. James Madison, "Father" of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, condemned the defacement of the flag of any nation as an attack upon that nation's sovereignty and a violation of the law.

Likewise, Thomas Jefferson recognized the sovereignty interest in the flag and said the First Amendment did not prohibit "systematic and severe" punishment for those who violated the flag. Both Jefferson and Madison believed that protecting the flag did not suppress expression but protected the incidents of sovereignty, including commerce, citizenship and neutrality rights.

In 1907 the Supreme Court confirmed "from the earliest periods in the history of the human race, banners, standards and ensigns have been adopted. It is not then remarkable that the American people . . . early in their history, prescribed a flag as symbolical of the existence and sovereignty of the Nation."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Max Hall issues apology

Ute fans hated Max Hall long before he returned the favor Saturday night. My...

Hall's pain reflects self betrayal

This whole thing is so laughable. It's hilarious to me how much press this...

Max Hall issues apology

Nice institution of higher learning. Not. Please Max, go to class.

I still agree with Max Hall's first comments. Too bad he apologized.

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

I have always been a Utah, BYU and MWC/former WAC fan (I am a Utah grad and...

Max Hall issues apology

Get real. They couldn't get to their car because Utes fans were assaulting...

Max Hall issues apology

"...Last year at RES my family was spit on, had beer dumped on them, and were...

Hall's pain reflects self betrayal

This is why few people read your column.

I am happy to see an actual apology (and clarification) rather than the...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

I am disapointed that so many have excused or worse condoned the hateful...

Advertisements