From Deseret News archives:

Needy families must be top priority

Published: Friday, Sept. 2, 2005 9:16 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
On Aug. 30, the Census Bureau released income data that showed only a slight increase in the number of people living in poverty nationwide. While that is certainly good news, a celebration is not in order. Child poverty rates in the United States remain unacceptably high — one in six children lives in poverty. While news articles were quick to say overall poverty did not rise in Utah (it didn't decline either), not much was said about the increase in child poverty to 13.1 percent. These children, almost the equivalent of every man, woman and child in Tooele, Summit and Wasatch counties combined, are the ones who will be hurt by cuts being considered by Congress this September.

In Utah, there are almost 100,000 children living in poverty. The official 2004 poverty threshold is $19,311 for a family of four. If a parent works full time earning only minimum wage, he will take home less than half of the federal poverty threshold. And studies show it may take double that level just to make ends meet. It's time to support hard work and make sure the children in these families stay healthy, do well in school and grow up to become productive adults.

The economy may be beginning to show signs of recovery, but it is a slow and weak recovery in comparison to similar periods in our nation's history. Salaries and wages have increased by only 2 percent, while corporate profits have skyrocketed more than 15 percent.

Census data show an increasing number of families in Utah rely on food stamps and Medicaid to make ends meet. In Utah 134,586 individuals rely on food stamps and 222,000 thousand receive Medicaid, including 140,000 children.

Story continues below
Instead of doing something to help, Congress is on the verge of balancing the budget on the backs of working families and their children. Come September, Congress will consider cuts to food stamps, Medicaid and other vital programs by $35 billion over the next five years while spending $70 billion more in tax cuts targeted mainly toward CEOs and multimillion-dollar households. A vote in favor of these budget cuts or more tax breaks is just wrong.

The Senate and House agriculture committees may cut as much as $3 billion from the food-stamp program. Since 80 percent of food-stamp households are families with children, this is the largest child nutrition program.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

McKay is A-OK in his return

To say that Collie would lobby for the ball? Puuullleeeaaassseee! Collie was...

Water wars in Snake Valley

I agree that pumping the aquifers in nothern nevada or anywhere else is...

What a lovely, extraordinary reminder of important matters. I wonder where I...

TCU moves into 4th place in BCS

The Ute played their worst opponent in some time (years. That is not a good...

House passes health care bill

I give the GOP credit for at least acknowledging we have a problem and for...

The increasing unemployment of democrats will naturally result in an overall...

Hey TCU, you guys got this one in the bag. Don't practice, scheme or prepare...

Anonymous seems to have a bone to pick, the comments about ..."It's not just...

I have never met anyone who pouts naturally - maybe I just haven't met enough...

It is your year South Summit. Go make it happen.

Advertisements
Advertisement