From Deseret News archives:

A bird in the hand . . .

Published: Thursday, Aug. 25, 2005 12:00 a.m. MDT
PRINT | FONT + - 
. . . is worth two in the bush. If the State of Utah would have heeded this proverb's counsel, it would have $50 million more in the bank. Instead, it ended up with zilch.

Here's what happened. Workers Compensation Fund wanted to wrest itself from state control because it needed to protect its out-of-state business interests. So the fund's managers approached the state with an offer. If the state surrendered its ownership rights — except as a policyholder — the fund would give the state a $50 million buy-out. This was fairly remarkable, considering the fund had operated free of state funding since 1922, when it repaid the state $40,000 in start-up money appropriated in 1917. In 1988, the Legislature turned the fund into a nonprofit enterprise that was not administered by the state in any way, although the governor retained the power to appoint the fund's board of directors.

Some people, including former Gov. Mike Leavitt's brother Dane, who heads the family's insurance empire, believed the state's interests in the WCF were substantially greater, perhaps even $300 million. Legislators opted for more time to study the issue. In the meantime, WCF sued the state.

Once again, in 2004, the $50 million buy-out was offered in conjunction with settlement of the lawsuit. But Gov. Olene Walker didn't accept the compromise bill, which was sponsored by Sen. Curt Bramble, R-Provo. Bramble twice attempted to run such bills, to no avail.

Earlier this week, the Utah Supreme Court upheld a lower court ruling that found the state held no ownership in the fund. The settlement offer had been pulled off the table long ago. The state walked away empty-handed.

It is perplexing that Govs. Leavitt and Walker weren't somewhat persuaded by the fact that the state's purview of the WCF had become extremely limited over time and that as a policyholder, the state had considerable interest in enabling WCF to protect its business interest elsewhere so it could continue to offer low rates.

To the lay person, a $50 million return on a $40,000 investment (albeit in 1917 dollars) appears to be a handsome buy-out. Far better than zilch.

About this ad

View Comments

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.

– About Comments

rss icon

Recommended in Opinion

Story

The NRC turned heads this week by approving licenses for two new nuclear power reactors in Georgia.

Story

With Rick Santorum's showing last week, people are again talking about a "brokered convention."

Story

Social issues of religious liberty, conscience and the definition of marriage have returned to public debate.

In Opinion Across Site